🚀 ProPicks AI Hits +34.9% Return!Read Now

U.S. bank regulators say four bank 'living wills' have shortcomings

Published 12/19/2017, 06:24 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The logo of Goldman Sachs is displayed in their office located in Sydney, Australia
C
-
BAC
-
GS
-
JPM
-
STT
-
WFC
-
MS
-
BK
-

By Pete Schroeder

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. banking regulators said Tuesday that "living wills" submitted by eight large U.S. banks are satisfactory, but half of those plans have "shortcomings" that should be addressed in the future.

The Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation found shortcomings in plans from Bank of America (N:BAC), Goldman Sachs (N:GS), Morgan Stanley (N:MS) and Wells Fargo (N:WFC), detailing how they could be safely taken apart should they face bankruptcy.

Regulators found no problems with plans submitted by Bank of New York Mellon (N:BK), Citigroup (N:C), J.P. Morgan Chase (N:JPM), or State Street (N:STT).

The resolution plans, commonly known as living wills, require large banks to detail for regulators how they could be unwound in cases of bankruptcy with minimal disruption to the financial system. If banks cannot gain regulatory approval for their plans, they could face more severe restrictions or even be ordered to divest.

Tuesday's results serve as a relatively clean bill of health for the nation's largest and most complex institutions. It marks the first time since 2014 that neither the Fed nor the FDIC found significant issues with those plans that merit immediate action by banks.

The regulators said the 2017 results show "significant progress" had been made in the banking sector in recent years.

Of the banks facing shortcomings in their plans, there was no unifying concern. For example, regulators said Goldman needed to address an issue related to the bank's "separability analysis related to the actionability of divestiture options," while Bank of America was told it should take a second look at its derivatives portfolio.

Regulators said four areas where all banks need to refine their focus in the years ahead include: intra-group liquidity, internal loss-absorbing capacity, derivatives, and payment, clearing and settlement activities.

Large banks have been required to submit plans detailing how they could be safely taken apart in a time of crisis since 2012, after the requirement was included in the Dodd-Frank financial reform law.

In September, regulators announced they would be giving banks more time to submit their living wills, as part of a broader effort to ease post-crisis rules. The banks are not required to submit new plans until July 1, 2019.

Banks had argued the annual cycle for submitting living wills - which can comprise thousands of pages - was too onerous.

In a June report, the U.S. Treasury recommended extending the cycle to two years, revising the threshold for banks that must submit living wills, and increasing the transparency of guidance regulators feedback on to banks on the plans.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The logo of Goldman Sachs is displayed in their office located in Sydney, Australia

(Corrects Reuters Instrument Code for Bank of New York Mellon to BK.N, not BNY.N in paragraph 3 and metadata.)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.