🔥 Premium AI-powered Stock Picks from InvestingPro Now up to 50% OffCLAIM SALE

U.S. Supreme Court orders reconsideration of racial bias claim against Charter Communications

Published 03/30/2020, 09:51 AM
Updated 03/30/2020, 06:30 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Comedian and producer Byron Allen leaves the Supreme Court in Washington
CMCSA
-
CHTR
-

By Andrew Chung

(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ordered a lower court to reconsider its decision to let comedian-turned-media executive Byron Allen's $10 billion lawsuit accusing cable television operator Charter Communications Inc (NASDAQ:CHTR) of discriminating against black-owned channels move forward.

The justices sent the case back to the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to take a second look at it after the Supreme Court ruled on March 23 in a similar lawsuit by Allen against Comcast Corp (NASDAQ:CMCSA) that the appeals court assessed the claims of racial bias using the wrong test.

Comcast and Charter had refused to carry channels operated by Allen's Entertainment Studios Networks. Allen is black.

The cases centered on whether under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, a post-Civil War law that forbids racial discrimination in business contracts, lawsuits like Allen's must show early on in the litigation that a failed deal was solely the result of discrimination. The 9th Circuit ruled in 2018 that discriminatory intent could be merely one factor among others.

The justices in the Comcast case unanimously found that to prevail "a plaintiff must initially plead and ultimately prove that, but for race, it would not have suffered."

The cable operators said their business decisions were based on capacity constraints, not race, and that Allen's channels, including Justice Central.TV and Cars.TV, did not show sufficient promise or customer demand to merit distribution.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Comedian and producer Byron Allen leaves the Supreme Court in Washington

Entertainment Studios Networks, which sued Charter in Los Angeles federal court in 2016, attributed the rejections primarily to racial discrimination. Comcast and Charter called the lawsuits a "scam" and sought to have them dismissed.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.