Breaking News
Get 45% Off 0
🚨 Don’t miss your updated list of AI-picked stocks for this month
Pick Stocks with AI

OCC Stops Removal Of In-House Examiners: Banks To Benefit?

By Zacks Investment ResearchStock MarketsDec 07, 2017 12:33AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/occ-stops-removal-of-inhouse-examiners-banks-to-benefit-200271497
OCC Stops Removal Of In-House Examiners: Banks To Benefit?
By Zacks Investment Research   |  Dec 07, 2017 12:33AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
 
C
-1.29%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
BAC
+2.16%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
JPM
-0.35%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
WFC
+0.50%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

In a policy reversal by the banking regulator, examiners will continue working at banks they supervise. In a statement to Bloomberg News, the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) head Joseph Otting said, “Upon review, it is not practical to continue the agency’s efforts to move resident examiners out of on-site locations.”

High cost of independent real estate and the burden examiners will likely face in moving back and forth between government offices and Wall Street banks were cited as the reasons for halting the effort.

Otting commented that other measures such as rotating examiners from bank to bank show that the OCC is serious about stopping ‘regulatory capture.’ He said, “The agency will continue to review its locations and real estate strategy to ensure they support the agency’s mission in the most operationally and cost-effective manner possible.”

For years, the OCC has been intending to move hundreds of in-house examiners who worked at offices of big banks including Bank of America (NYSE:C) , JPMorgan (NYSE:JPM) , Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) and Citigroup (NYSE:C) . The primary aim to remove examiners from on-site locations was to prevent them from becoming lenient in scrutinizing banking operations.

Notably, former OCC head Thomas Curry led the efforts to remove in-house supervisors. He intended to leave a small number of examiners on site while moving the others to neutral locations.

In reality, no significant progress seems to have been made on this front. According to the regulator, nearly 65% of the major bank examiners remain on-site. In fact, this number has risen over the last couple of years.

So, though at present banks are not expected to reap any benefits from the change in policy, there are chances that they might gain in the long run. With supervisors remaining on-site, there are chances that they might not report business misconducts and banks may take undue risks.

Also, the plan indicates that banking regulators are gradually trying to lessen Wall Street oversight (one of the big electoral promise made by President Donald Trump) despite not making any real progress on that front.

Of the above-mentioned big banks, JPMorgan, Citigroup and BofA carry a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

Zacks' Hidden Trades

While we share many recommendations and ideas with the public, certain moves are hidden from everyone but selected members of our portfolio services. Would you like to peek behind the curtain today and view them?

Starting now, for the next month, I invite you to follow all Zacks' private buys and sells in real time from value to momentum...from stocks under $10 to ETF to option movers...from insider trades to companies that are about to report positive earnings surprises (we've called them with 80%+ accuracy). You can even look inside portfolios so exclusive that they are normally closed to new investors.

Click here for Zacks' secret trade>>

J P Morgan Chase & Co (JPM): Free Stock Analysis Report

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC): Free Stock Analysis Report

Citigroup Inc. (C): Free Stock Analysis Report

Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC): Free Stock Analysis Report

Original post

Zacks Investment Research

OCC Stops Removal Of In-House Examiners: Banks To Benefit?
 

Related Articles

OCC Stops Removal Of In-House Examiners: Banks To Benefit?

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Apple
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email