
Please try another search
Among the major integrated energy firms, ExxonMobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM) and Chevron Corporation (NYSE:CVX) deserve a special mention, since they have such massive market caps of $351.4 billion and $222.6 billion, respectively. Thus, these companies dominate and define the Zacks Oil International industry.
These energy majors have a strong earnings surprise history, as they have managed to surpass the Zacks Consensus Estimate for earnings in three of the last four quarters. And, Exxon and Cevron have an average positive earnings surprise of 8.8% and 1.8%, respectively.
During the third quarter of 2017, ExxonMobil’s revenues of $66.165 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $63.508 billion. Moreover, earnings of 93 cents surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 89 cents.
Chevron’s third-quarter performance has also been impressive. Revenues of $36.205 billion steered past the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $33.667 billion. On top of that, earnings of $1.03 per share surpassed the consensus mark of 99 cents.
Although both the stocks are attractive picks for investors based on their earnings reports, our research shows ExxonMobil is a better choice than Chevron.
The Analysis
We have employed three parameters for an in-depth comparative analysis.
Strong Potential to Generate Cash Flow
Investors look for indicators that gauge the ability of a company to generate free cash flow from investments. For this purpose, we have employed the free cash flow yield ratio. Companies with strong operations generally have high free cash flow yield, indicating that the amount of money investors are generating is more than the amount spent to buy the stock.
Our proprietary model shows that free cash flow yield for ExxonMobil stands at 4.4%, way higher than 1.9% for Chevron.
Sufficient Funds to Meet Capital Expenditure
We calculate a company’s free cash flow after deducting capital spending from operating cash flow. Over the last four quarters, free cash flow for ExxonMobil came in at $15.263 billion, indicating that the firm has sufficient cash flow to fund capital spending. In other words, ExxonMobil generated $30.051 billion in net cash from core operations, while its capital spending amounted $14.788 billion.
Chevron’s free cash flow of $4.376 billion is considerably lower than that of ExxonMobil. This signifies that the possibility of Chevron to rely on debt for financing future operations is significantly higher than ExxonMobil.
Healthy Balance Sheet
From a comparative study of the debt-to-capitalization ratio, it is clear that ExxonMobil has significantly less reliance on debt than Chevron. The debt-to-capitalization ratio of ExxonMobil presently stands at 11.6% against 23% for Chevron.
ExxonMobil also has lower long-term debt despite it being 1.6 times bigger taking into consideration its market capitalization. The company’s long-term debt load, as of Sept 30, stands at $24.869 billion, much lower than $34.075 billion for Chevron. Also, ExxonMobil’s long-term debt is substantially lower than $56.893 billion for BP Plc (NYSE:BP) and $79.681 billion for Royal Dutch Shell (LON:RDSa) plc RDS.A.
Conclusion
Our comparative analysis shows that return from investment in ExxonMobil is way higher than Chevron. This is also reflected in ExxonMobil’s current Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), which implies that the stock will significantly outperform the broader U.S. equity market over the next one to three months. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
Meanwhile, Chevron carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), signifying that the stock will perform in line with the broader U.S. equity market over the next one to three months.
The Hottest Tech Mega-Trend of All
Last year, it generated $8 billion in global revenues. By 2020, it's predicted to blast through the roof to $47 billion. Famed investor Mark Cuban says it will produce ""the world's first trillionaires,"" but that should still leave plenty of money for regular investors who make the right trades early.
See Zacks' 3 Best Stocks to Play This Trend >>
Defense stocks took a tumble heading into 2025 as President Trump returned to the White House for his second term. Trump has stated his intent as a peacemaker to bring the wars in...
Using the Elliott Wave Principle (EWP), we have been tracking the most likely path forward for the Nasdaq 100 (NDX). Although there are many ways to navigate the markets and to...
Investors are on edge about what tariff policy means for markets Coming off a strong Q4 earnings season, fresh February corporate sales figures can help assess the macro...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.