Breaking News
Get 45% Off 0
🚨 Don’t miss your updated list of AI-picked stocks for this month
Pick Stocks with AI

College Endowments: Bad News And A Slender Silver Lining

By AllAboutAlpha Market OverviewFeb 08, 2013 01:27AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/college-endowments:-bad-news-and-a-slender-silver-lining-154449
College Endowments: Bad News And A Slender Silver Lining
By AllAboutAlpha   |  Feb 08, 2013 01:27AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
 
Silver
-1.43%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
NWSA
+2.00%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
IMOB
-2.46%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

The 2012 NACUBO-Commonfund Study of Endowments indicates that the endowments of the 831 U.S. colleges and universities in its database returned a disappointing average in fiscal year 2012. Indeed, return was in essence flat (-0.3 percent net of fees).

This is especially disappointing in that it is such a sharp decline from the previous fiscal year, when average performance was 19.2 percent.

The silver lining is that long-term performance at many institutions may be improving. The ten-year returns for FY 2012 were 6.2 percent, which is up from 5.6 percent a year before.

But that’s a narrow silver lining indeed. After all, the portion of an endowment used to support the current operations of an educational institution is typically around 4 to 5 percent. Thus, operations together with inflation are eating up what gain there is, even on that long-term view.

The National Association of College and University Business Officers has been publishing this annual study in collaboration with the education and research arm of Commonfund since 2009, and it continues work that NACUBO was doing solo for seven years before that.

An Alternatives Takeaway
For the alternative-investment industry, though, the takeaway this year may be that there is a long-term trend of increasing allocations to alternative strategies, and that this trend continues. The overall such allocation increased by one percentage point from 2011 to 2012: to 54 percent.

The specifics of this trend depend upon endowment size. Endowments with more than $1 billion assets under management have 61 percent of that allocated to alternatives. That number steadily decreases as one moves through the categories, until in the smallest category (under $25 million AUM) the percentage is only 11 percent.

What are ‘alternatives’? NACUBO-Commonfund understands by that term allocations to any of seven distinct strategies: private equity; marketable alternatives (that is, hedge funds); venture capital; PE non-campus real estate; energy & natural resources; commodities; or distressed debt.

Nacubo1
Nacubo1


From: 2012 NACUBO-Commonfund Study of Endowments

The mix among those varieties of alternative is displayed above. Hedge funds are the largest allocation within the group, representing roughly one-third of the whole. For the smaller endowments, those with fewer than $25 million or those with between $25 and $50 million, this percentage is 62 or 58 percent, respectively.

Nacubo 2
Nacubo 2

From: 2012 NACUBO-Commonfund Study of Endowments

Endowments seem to see distressed debt and venture capital strategies are quite exotic – those are still only a very small portion of the whole alternatives allocation, whatever the size of the portfolio.

Performance
But let’s return to the issue of performance. As the table indicates, NACUBO-Commonfund broke the performance figures down by the size of the endowments’ involved, as well as by the time horizon. The best performance year to year continues to come from the largest category, educational endowments with assets under management in excess of $1 billion. There were 68 of them in the database last year, and they returned 0.8 percent.

The worst performance, though, came not from the smallest (under $25 million AUM). The smallest category did manage a positive return net of fees, though performance was still in essence flat for those endowments; that is, at 0.3 percent. The worst performance came in fact from the middle range of size. Endowments with $51 to $100 million AUM lost -1.0; those with $101 to $500 million lost -0.7.

The average one-year returns for the alternative strategies employed by these endowments varied widely, both among strategies and year-by-year. The two strategies that performed best in 2011 were also two of the biggest disappointments in 2012. Commodities and managed futures returned 26 percent for endowments in 2011, but lost -10.1 percent in 2012. Likewise, energy & natural resources returned 23.5 percent in 2011 but lost -0.8 in 2012.

Officials of the sponsoring organizations discussed these results with reporters at a breakfast meeting on the final day of January, 2013. Some of the discussion, too, turned on new revenue streams available to colleges and universities, especially online learning and massive open online courses (MOOCs). Indeed, the website InformationWeek has asked whether 2013 will become known as the “Year of the MOOC.”

If their endowments don’t improve performance soon and with some consistency, they’d better hope the answer to that is “yes.”

College Endowments: Bad News And A Slender Silver Lining
 

Related Articles

College Endowments: Bad News And A Slender Silver Lining

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Apple
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email