Please try another search
The Bank of Japan shouted down the debt laden economy on Thursday evening in the US. Following Europe’s precedent, they took interest rates on a certain segment of bank assets negative.
News flash: Asset prices rise from a small change in investor asset preference, nothing else is expected to change.
Where’s this all heading? When doing scenario analysis, I think it helps to look at the extreme case. Is this the path to a world where negative interest rates are the norm? Will we eventually pay companies to expand production, hire workers or pass dividends to shareholders? That world looks, to me, like a pseudo-Marxist state or perhaps the most backdoor inheritance tax or generational passing of wealth ever invented. If this sounds absurd or undesirable, it is.
If you’re a commercial bank, what would you do? First, you ask your systems’ providers if your software can handle negative interest rates. Then you sit and contemplate potential business transactions where you contractually give $104 in order to receive $100 at sometime in the future…. Finally, you run and get the largest Folger’s can you can find, fill it with C-Notes and stick it in your vault. Sure seems like a sure-fire way to bring the whole premise of capitalism to a halt.
These supply side ideals are flawed. The demand curve is important as well. With a lot of debt, it is hard to shift the demand curve. With a lot of savings, this is more easily accomplished. When you force supply into an economy with flat demand, the price level goes down. I’m not sure these policies align with the stated inflation goals.
Central banks are not raising price levels. They are not even raising the expected price level. They are raising the range of possible outcomes for inflation. The factor that they’re raising for all of us is Risk.
In this world, debt quality is an important consideration for correlations. The preference for the extreme Beta plays, both positive and negative, has increased. The preference for the risk-free asset has increased, as has the preference for extremely low and high duration fixed income. Overall risk in one’s portfolio should decrease given the large range of possible outcomes.
It seems surreal that Donald Trump has been in office for only two weeks. That’s because the amount of excitement he’s generated so far… is already more than most presidents...
President Trump’s tariffs on Mexico and Canada have been postponed to March 1st after successful negotiations. US-China trade tensions continue to escalate with both countries...
Over the weekend, President Trump announced tariffs of 25% on both Canada and Mexico, as well as a 10% tariff on China. Such was not unexpected, as contained in the Trump tariff...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.