Breaking News
Get 45% Off 0
Selloff or market correction? Either way, here's what to do next
See Overvalued Stocks

4 Reasons Why Investors Love Passive ETFs

By Zacks Investment ResearchStock MarketsNov 20, 2017 05:03AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/4-reasons-why-investors-love-passive-etfs-200266969
4 Reasons Why Investors Love Passive ETFs
By Zacks Investment Research   |  Nov 20, 2017 05:03AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
 
UK100
-1.27%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
US500
-1.22%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
SPY
-1.18%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
ARKK
-3.45%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
SPY
-1.62%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
LIT
0.00%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

While the ETF industry is growing by leaps and bounds, investors’ inclination toward passive ETFs is quite remarkable. There are about 1836 non-leveraged ETFs listed on U.S. indexes with an average market-cap of $3.29 trillion and average expense ratio of 0.57%, as per xtf.com.

Among them, 900 are passively managed, followed by 740 ETFs following the enhanced strategy and 196 active funds. It is being noted that though the investment objective of active funds looks more promising, the gush of money is flowing into passive investment vehicles, as per John “Mac” McQuown, co-founder of Dimensional Fund Advisors, (ab the $550bn investment group), as quoted on Financial Times.

Inside the Increasing Interest in Passive Funds

Low Expense Ratio

The outperformance was attributed to the strong performance and a low expense ratio. Expense ratios of active funds are higher than passive funds. Low expense ratio has been instrumental lately in amassing investors’ assets. Most ETF issuers have embarked upon the fee war (read: BlackRock Slashes Fees, ETF Price War Intensifies).

BlackRock has been pretty proactive in slashing expense ratios for several products in a year. It is being said that the company took the step to give tough competition to other low-cost players like Vanguard and Schwab. As a result, the company has been witnessing strong inflows in recent quarters (read: Solid ETF Asset Inflows Boost BlackRock Earnings).

For example, BlackRock lowered fees for its S&P 500 tracking ETF, iShares Core S&P 500 IVV, from 0.07% to 0.04%. The fee cut made IVV less expensive than another popular ETF, SPDR S&P 500 ETF (AX:SPY) , in its domain. The fund charges 9 bps in fees. However, yet another S&P 500-based ETF, Vanguard S&P 500 ETF VOO, also charges 4 bps in fees (read: Buy These ETFs as BlackRock Cuts Fees).

The Financial Times article went on to explain that “BlackRock and Vanguard, the two biggest players in the passive investing world, manage nearly $11tn between them, having taken in nearly $600bn this year — the vast majority of it in ETFs and index-tracking mutual funds.”

Bull Market

Since Trump’s win last November, Wall Street has been buoyant barring some occasional slips. The global economy has been prospering, giving ways to a broad-based bull market, in which most market-linked products are trending. This in turn marred the appeal for active ETFs.

Some of the top-performing active ETFs in the last one-year frame were ARK Web x.0 ETF ARKW (up 70.9%) followed by ARK Innovation ETF (KW:ARKK) (up 68.8%) and ARK Industrial Innovation ETF ARKQ (up 56.5%).

And the top-performing passive ETFs were Guggenheim China Technology ETF CQQQ (up 70.1%), Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (AX:LIT) (up 66.1%), VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strat Metals ETF REMX (up 61.2%), Global X Robotics & Artfcl Intllgnc ETF BOTZ (up 58.4%) and iShares PHLX Semiconductor ETF SOXX (up 48.7%).

In a year, Europe-based active fund First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF RFEU (which charges 83 bps in fees) has gained 25.5% (as of Nov 17) while the passive fund Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF VGK (which charges 10 bps in fees) has added 25%.

If performances of passive ETFs are on par with (or even better than) the active ones, why will investors flock to active ETFs at higher charges?

Quantitative Strategies of Passive ETFs

Several passive ETFs are factor-based and use quantitative strategies. In line with the article published on Financial Times, we also believe that such strategies make passive ETFs more active and position them better to pick the right stock.

Downside of Transparency in Active ETFs

One of the major drawbacks of actively managed ETFs is the obligation of the disclosure of daily portfolio holdings, which run the risk of enabling “front-running” of portfolio trades. This means that the revelation of stock holdings will give the issuer’s competitors or other investors a chance to cash in on advance information (read: Will Active ETFs Rule Ahead?).

Want key ETF info delivered straight to your inbox?

Zacks’ free Fund Newsletter will brief you on top news and analysis, as well as top-performing ETFs, each week. Get it free >>



SPDR-SP 500 TR (SPY (NYSE:SPY)): ETF Research Reports

GUGG-CHINA TEC (CQQQ): ETF Research Reports

ISHARS-PHLX SEM (SOXX): ETF Research Reports

ARK- WEB XO ETF (ARKW): ETF Research Reports

VANGD-SP5 ETF (VOO): ETF Research Reports

ISHARS-SP500 (IVV): ETF Research Reports

ARK-INNOVATION (ARKK): ETF Research Reports

GLBL-X LITHIUM (LIT): ETF Research Reports

VANGD-FTSE EUR (VGK): ETF Research Reports

ARK-INDUS INNOV (ARKQ): ETF Research Reports

VANECK-RAR ERTH (REMX): ETF Research Reports

FT-RF DYN-EUR (RFEU): ETF Research Reports

GLBL-X ROB&ART (BOTZ): ETF Research Reports

Original post

Zacks Investment Research

4 Reasons Why Investors Love Passive ETFs
 

Related Articles

Dr. Arnout ter Schure
Is the S&P 500 Road to 6400-6500 in Jeopardy? By Dr. Arnout ter Schure - Mar 04, 2025 3

Using the Elliott Wave Principle (EWP), we have been successfully tracking the most likely path forward for the S&P 500 (SPX) over several months. Although there are many ways...

4 Reasons Why Investors Love Passive ETFs

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Apple
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email