Get 40% Off
🤯 Perficient is up a mind-blowing 53%. Our ProPicks AI saw the buying opportunity in March.Read full update

Mid Cap Value Style 3Q19: Best And Worst

Published 09/25/2019, 01:06 PM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:32 AM

The Mid Cap Value style ranks seventh out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our 3Q19 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter, the Mid Cap Value style ranked eighth. It gets our Neutral rating, which is based on an aggregation of ratings of nine ETFs and 178 mutual funds in the Mid Cap Value style as of July 15, 2019. See a recap of our 2Q19 Style Ratings here.

Figure 1 ranks from best to worst the eight Mid Cap Value ETFs that meet our liquidity standards and Figure 2 shows the five best and worst-rated Mid Cap Value mutual funds. Not all Mid Cap Value style ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 26 to 2076). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings.

Investors seeking exposure to the Mid Cap Value style should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2.

Our Robo-Analyst technology[1] empowers our unique ETF and mutual fund rating methodology, which leverages our rigorous analysis of each fund’s holdings.[2] We think advisors and investors focused on prudent investment decisions should include analysis of fund holdings in their research process for ETFs and mutual funds.

ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings

* Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (NASDAQ:FAB) is excluded from Figure 1 because its total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .
Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5

* Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) is excluded from Figure 2 because its total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums.

State Street (NYSE:STT) SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (NYSE:ONEY) is the top-rated Mid Cap Value ETF and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund (FIDFX) is the top-rated Mid Cap Value mutual fund. ONEY earns an Attractive rating and FIDFX earns a Very Attractive rating.

NuShares Nuveen ESG Mid Cap Value ETF (NYSE:NUMV) is the worst rated Mid Cap Value ETF and Gabelli Focus Five Fund (GWSAX) is the worst rated Mid Cap Value mutual fund. NUMV earns a Neutral rating and GWSAX earns a Very Unattractive rating.

The Danger Within

Buying a fund without analyzing its holdings is like buying a stock without analyzing its business and finances. Put another way, research on fund holdings is necessary due diligence because a fund’s performance is only as good as its holdings’ performance. Don’t just take our word for it, see what Barron’s says on this matter.

PERFORMANCE OF HOLDINGs = PERFORMANCE OF FUND

Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Mid Cap Value ETFs and mutual funds.

Separating the Best ETFs from the Worst Funds

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Separating the Best Mutual Funds from the Worst Funds

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.