
Please try another search
Some low key selling yesterday, from indices other than the NASDAQ, but not enough damage to reverse the breakouts. Bulls still doing enough to keep the bounce intact. Starting with the positive, the NASDAQ finished a little higher with a bullish hammer and a relative out-performance advantage against the S&P; although the 'bullish hammer' is not a true hammer because momentum is not oversold.
The S&P also finished with a bullish 'hammer,' but not enough to close higher—although the day felt bullish. There was a bounce off relative performance, which keeps things positive, but it has lost a lot of ground since.
The Russell 2000 (via iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSE:IWM)) lost nearly 3%, finishing on breakout support and losing relative ground against the NASDAQ.
The Semiconductor Index is building a 'bullish flag' just shy of the 'death cross' between the 50-day and 200-day MA.
Tuesday will be about defending breakout support and pushing through overhead 200-day moving average resistance.
While market cap weighting is still the go-to for many investors due to its low cost and low turnover, it's becoming increasingly fragile these days thanks to the concentration...
The oldest ETF, the SPDR S&P 500 Trust, had the most inflows in February. The $14.6 billion in inflows allowed it to surpass the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. Which ETFs saw the...
Leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) substantially increase the potential reward of an investment by affording investors the chance to generate double or triple the returns of...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.