🐂 Not all bull runs are created equal. November’s AI picks include 5 stocks up +20% eachUnlock Stocks

Republican state officials threaten legal action over company diversity policies

Published 07/13/2023, 05:42 PM
Updated 07/14/2023, 10:21 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: 60 Wall Street, an office building with commercial space available in the financial district, is seen in New York City, U.S., July 7, 2023.  REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
MSFT
-
GOOGL
-
AAPL
-
GOOG
-
UBER
-

(This July 13 story has been refiled to replace 'attorney generals' with 'attorneys general' throughout)

By Daniel Wiessner

(Reuters) - A group of Republican U.S. state attorneys general on Thursday warned the country's largest companies that certain workforce diversity policies could be illegal in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision effectively striking down affirmative action in higher education.

The 13 officials in letters sent to the 100 largest U.S. companies said the court last month made clear that any policy that treats people differently because of their race is illegal, even when it is adopted with good intentions.

The attorneys general urged the companies to abandon race-based quotas or preferences in hiring, promotion and contracting and threatened legal action "sooner rather than later" if they do not.

"Companies that engage in racial discrimination should and will face serious legal consequences," the attorneys general wrote.

The officials singled out about a dozen companies that they said have used racial quotas and other explicitly race-based practices, including Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) Inc's Google, Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT), and Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) Corp.

Those companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach and his counterpart in Tennessee, Jonathan Skrmetti, spearheaded the letter. They were joined by the attorneys general of Indiana, South Carolina and Missouri, among others.

The Supreme Court ruling last month said Harvard University's and the University of North Carolina's race-conscious admissions policies violated the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of equal protection under the law.

The decision does not directly affect employers, but in a concurring opinion Justice Neil Gorsuch noted that the federal law banning race bias in federally-funded programs, including higher education, is "essentially identical" to the law prohibiting workplace discrimination.

The decision is widely expected to spur legal challenges to admissions policies at universities and high schools and to corporate diversity initiatives that take race into account.

Federal and state laws already bar companies from explicitly considering race in making employment decisions, but there is little recent precedent on the legality of diversity programs.

Companies have had policies aimed at diversifying their workforce for decades. But many began looking more closely at the issue beginning in 2020, in the national debate on race spurred by the death of George Floyd and other Black people at the hands of police.

Proponents of corporate diversity initiatives say that along with creating more equity, they attract better talent and can be good for business when they have support among a company's customer base.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: 60 Wall Street, an office building with commercial space available in the financial district, is seen in New York City, U.S., July 7, 2023.  REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo

But in Thursday's letter, the attorneys general said well-intentioned race discrimination is still illegal.

"The argument that different rules should govern racial classifications designed to include rather than exclude ... has been repeatedly rejected," they wrote.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.