🥇 First rule of investing? Know when to save! Up to 55% off InvestingPro before BLACK FRIDAYCLAIM SALE

Global index funds seek to shift out of Chinese ADRs as delisting looms

Published 04/12/2022, 03:55 AM
Updated 04/12/2022, 04:10 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A man stands on an overpass with an electronic board showing Shanghai and Shenzhen stock indexes, at the Lujiazui financial district in Shanghai, China January 6, 2021. REUTERS/Aly Song//File Photo
UK100
-
005930
-

By Samuel Shen and Selena Li

SHANGHAI/HONG KONG (Reuters) - Global index-tracking fund managers with exposure to U.S.-listed Chinese firms are pushing index providers to swap into their Hong Kong-traded peers as delisting risks threaten to roil the $37 billion market for China-focused exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

Washington is demanding complete access to the audit papers of these firms, a request so far denied by Beijing. Without a solution, Chinese American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) will be delisted by 2024, potentially bashing ETFs with big ADR exposure.

"We have proactively engaged all of our index providers on the risks associated with ADR delisting," said Brendan Ahern, CIO of Krane Funds Advisors, which manages China-focused ETFs based on CSI and MSCI indices.

"Passive ETF managers will want their index providers to transition from ADRs to the HK share classes in order to avoid tracking error," he said, referring to the unwelcome performance difference between an ETF and the index it tracks.

"Index providers are moving at varying speeds," he added.

ETF managers including CSOP Asset Management and Samsung (KS:005930) Asset Management said they have also nudged their index providers to swap Chinese ADRs into Hong Kong-traded peers, where available.

Some smaller index companies, such as China Securities Index Co, said they have started the switching but the likes of S&P Dow Jones Indices and MSCI are more cautious, citing the need for further clarity around Sino-U.S. audit talks, and concerns over relatively low liquidity levels in Hong Kong.

Also, many active fund managers, unfettered by index-tracking needs, have already dumped ADRs, or made the transition to Hong Kong shares.

TRACKING ERRORS

ADR exposure of the S&P New China Sector Index ETF, run by CSOP, has decreased to 6% from over 30% a year ago after discussions between the Hong Kong-based asset manager and its index provider, portfolio manager Wang Yi said.

Last month, Chinese index publisher China Securities Index started prioritising inclusion of Hong Kong-listed stocks for its CSI Overseas China Internet Index, when a company has multiple listings eligible for selection.

The index is tracked by a $6 billion ETF run by KraneShares and many other index funds.

Others are also holding out.

Earlier this month, China proposed rules that would potentially give U.S. regulators access to Chinese companies' audit working papers, as Beijing seeks to reach a deal to keep Chinese ADRs listed.

Mike Shiao, Invesco's chief investment officer, Asia ex-Japan, said the overhang on U.S.-listed Chinese companies was "partially" removed, but Invesco, which runs an ETF heavily invested in ADRs, would continue to monitor the U.S. response.

S&P Dow Jones declined comment on potential changes to methodologies, while MSCI and FTSE Russell also declined comment.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Passers-by are reflected on a panel displaying the morning trading of top active securities at the Hong Kong Stocks Exchange in Hong Kong, China, August 26, 2015.  REUTERS/Bobby Yip

Underscoring some investors' impatience, the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF said last month that it aimed to fully transition to Hong Kong shares in coming months.

"Could an ETF convert without the index provider? Yes, though it would create tracking error," KraneShares' Ahern said. "Obviously one would rather have tracking error versus holding a stock through a delisting," he said.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.