Cyber Monday Deal: Up to 60% off InvestingProCLAIM SALE

ETFs for Exposure to the 'Magnificent Seven' Stocks

Published 07/21/2023, 10:49 AM
Updated 07/25/2024, 05:25 AM
NDX
-
MSFT
-
GOOGL
-
AAPL
-
AMZN
-
NVDA
-
XRX
-
IBM
-
TSLA
-
GOOG
-


CNBC's Jim Cramer recently put forth an argument in favor of sticking with what he dubs the "Magnificent Seven" — the seven U.S. mega-cap stocks currently driving the market: Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL), Meta, Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA), and Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), which can be thought of as the new FAANG-esque cohort of 2023.

He expressed the ease and assurance in investing in these high-performing stocks, noting that their price targets consistently head north. He underlined that despite potential short-term disturbances such as the Nasdaq 100 rebalancing, bond market shifts, or negative inflation news, analysts continue to have a wealth of reasons to recommend these stocks.

Maintaining a diversified portfolio is key, according to Cramer, but he stresses that certain companies, especially those among his Magnificent Seven, simply offer superior long-term value in his opinion. For investors that believe Cramer, mega-cap ETFs could offer a simple way of investing in these top stocks.

With Cramer's argument in mind, let's look at three NYSE-listed ETFs that offer concentrated exposure to the Magnificent Seven, offering investors a simple yet effective way to capitalize on U.S. mega-cap stocks. However, at the end I'll also offer you my contrarian argument against why investing in the Magnificent Seven may not be the best strategy.

iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF)

OEF tracks the S&P 100 Index, a somewhat outdated index that in many ways is the "bigger brother" of the more well-known S&P 500. This index consists of 100 mega-cap U.S. stocks selected by the S&P Index Committee. This makes it a concentrated play on America's largest publicly traded companies.

OEF has been around since October 2000, but has only attracted around $8.5 billion in terms of assets under management, or AUM. Not many investors know about this ETF and its index compared to the S&P 500, and its higher expense ratio of 0.20% may also be a deterrent.

Exposure to the Magnificent Seven as of July 18, 2023: 41.07%.

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG)

XLG is another mega-cap U.S. equity ETF that provides concentrated exposure to the Magnificent Seven. The XLG follows the S&P 500 Top 50 Index, which as its name suggests comprises a subset of the 50 largest and most influential companies within the S&P 500.

The methodology used by the XLG gives more weight to the largest companies, thereby offering more significant exposure to the Magnificent Seven compared to broader market ETFs. It costs the same 0.20% expense ratio as OEF and currently has around $2.4 billion in AUM.

Exposure to the Magnificent Seven as of July 18, 2023: 50.14%

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK)

Vanguard offers MGK, a growth-focused ETF which holds a considerable allocation to the Magnificent Seven. This ETF tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, which includes companies that exhibit growth characteristics among the largest U.S. firms.

The main advantage MGK holds over both OEF and XLG is with respect to fees. With an expense ratio of 0.07%, MGK is significantly more cost effective compared to both of the prior ETFs. It also pays has a 0.52% 30-day SEC yield as of June 30, 2023, making it a fairly tax-efficient ETF.

Exposure to the Magnificent Seven as of July 18, 2023: 56.49%

Why I don't like the Magnificent Seven

To put it bluntly, I disagree with Cramer (and if you do too, you can bet against him using the Inverse Cramer ETF). I'm not a fan of his endorsement of the "Magnificent Seven" and the implicit assumption that these tech behemoths are fail-safe investments.

While these companies have indeed delivered impressive returns and are current market leaders, this line of thinking can lull investors into a false sense of security, overlooking the inherent risks of such a highly concentrated portfolio.

Drawing on historical parallels, I'm reminded of the "Nifty Fifty" in the 1960s and 70s - a set of blue-chip stocks considered to be solid buys and hold forever by the market pundits of that era. These companies, which included giants like IBM (NYSE:IBM), Xerox (NASDAQ:XRX), and Polaroid, were viewed as invincible, and their stocks were seemingly always a good buy, no matter the price.

However, the 1980s told a different story, as many of these firms struggled, and their stock prices plunged during the subsequent bear market, leaving investors with substantial losses. Do you see any of these companies leading notable market indexes these days?

In a similar vein, placing too much faith in the Magnificent Seven could expose investors to considerable risk. It's not a question of the quality of these companies – they are undoubtedly pioneers in their respective fields and have solid fundamentals.

However, relying heavily on them for portfolio returns can be precarious. Market dynamics, regulatory changes, or even company-specific issues can impact the stocks' performance. Just as we saw with the Nifty Fifty, the market's darlings of one era can face challenges in the next.

Indeed, all three of the aforementioned ETFs have run up heavily year-to-date, as seen below. I would be cautious to chase hot performance at the risk of buying the top and experiencing poor returns afterwards. Remember, it's not sufficient to just buy good assets – investors also need to pay a good price for them.

Source: https://www.investing.com/pro/Investing.com Pro

Hence, while Cramer's Magnificent Seven captures the current zeitgeist of the tech-driven market, prudent investors might want to be wary of falling into the same trap as the Nifty Fifty. Mega-cap ETFs can provide exposure to these tech giants, but it's crucial to balance this with diversified investments across other sectors and market caps.

This content was originally published by our partners at ETF Central.

Latest comments

Loading next article…
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.