
Please try another search
Coronavirus may have originated in China – the largest emerging market (EM), but several EM ETFs felt lesser wrath than Wall Street in the virus-infected past month. Asian stocks, particularly trading in China, were hit hard initially, only to recoup losses later on (read: What Coronavirus? These China ETFs Gained Past Month).
The S&P 500-based ETF (ASX:SPY) lost 9.1% in the past month (as of Mar 5, 2020) while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSE:EEM) EEM shed about 6.8%. Some emerging market ETFs lost even lesser than EEM and are still offering compelling valuation.
Let’s take a look at what factors are acting in favor of EM ETFs (read: Is Coronavirus an "Opportunity" for Emerging Markets ETFs?).
Massive Fed Rate Cut
The U.S. central bank cut the target range for its federal funds rate by 50 bps to 1-1.25% during an emergency move on Mar 3, addressing the possible economic fallout owing to the coronavirus outbreak. It was the first emergency rate cut since the 2008 financial crisis (read: Emergency Fed Cut Less Effective: ETFs That Should Survive).
Thanks to a dovish Fed, EM equities should be up for a stellar performance. The Fed rate cut should keep the greenback’s strength at check. Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund UUP was off 1.6% past month (as of Mar 5, 2020). Since EM equities tend to perform better in a low-rate and low-dollar environment, EM assets now have every reason to outperform.
A Series of EM Rate Cuts
Last year, we noticed a great policy easing cycle in several emerging markets. Central banks in South Korea, Indonesia, India, Turkey, South Africa, Brazil, India and Russia resorted to rate cuts in order to keep signs of a slowdown at bay.
Better Growth Prospects
Emerging markets have long been investors’ choices owing to their high growth potential and rapid pace of industrialization. The EM growth potential has been stronger than developed economies. Thesigning of the phase-one U.S.-China trade deal also makes the case for emerging market investing stronger. “Emerging market stocks have outperformed developed markets by 1.7% since the beginning of February,” per UBS, as quoted on etfdb.com. UBS “expects this trend to continue.”
Coronavirus: A Short-Term Blip?
The impact of coronavirus is likely to be short-term, no matter how big a shape it takes. Previously, SARS was estimated to have reduced GDP growth in East Asia by around ½ to 1 percentage point in 2003, per the Australian Government’s Treasury department. The economic disruption was relatively short-lived, with the worst impact noted in the June quarter of 2003. So, once the adverse impact of virus lessens, EM should rebound. The new virus cases have already started to slow down in China. Many China ETFs have, in fact, gained in the past month.
Against this backdrop, we highlight below a few EM ETFs that have lost lesser than the S&P 500 in the past one month (as of Mar 5, 2020). These funds have P/E ratios lower than the S&P 500. Cheaper valuation and easy-money policies are likely to favor these ETFs in the near term.
ETFs in Focus
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific (NYSE:GMF) ETF GMF – down 1.39% past month
P/E: 14.70x; Zacks Rank #3 (Hold)
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF VWO – down 3.79%
P/E: 14.00x; Zacks Rank #3
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors (NYSE:QEMM) ETF QEMM – down 4.01%
P/E: 13.31x; Zacks Rank #3
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF SPEM – down 4.24%
P/E: 13.64x; Zacks Rank #3
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF IEMG – down 4.44%
P/E: 13.30x; Zacks Rank #3
Want key ETF info delivered straight to your inbox?
Zacks’ free Fund Newsletter will brief you on top news and analysis, as well as top-performing ETFs, each week. Get it free >>
Over the weekend I warned about the weakness in the Semiconductor sector (SMH). I also wrote about Granny Retail XRT, and how important it is for that sector to stay alive. Both...
Two weeks ago, the rumor mill ramped up again about the potential restructuring of Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC). The probing balloons centered around Taiwan Semiconductor...
More than a century ago, then-Representative William McKinley pursued an aggressive tariff strategy that sought to protect American industry and reduce reliance on foreign...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.