West Virginia clinic, doctor sue over state's new abortion ban

Published 02/01/2023, 06:48 PM
Updated 02/01/2023, 08:10 PM

By Brendan Pierson

(Reuters) - West Virginia's only abortion clinic and the clinic's primary doctor on Wednesday filed a lawsuit challenging the near-total abortion ban passed by the state last year, saying it violates patients' constitutional rights.

In their complaint in the Charleston, West Virginia federal court, Women's Health Center of West Virginia and the doctor, identified as John Doe, are asking the court for an immediate order blocking enforcement of the law while the case goes forward.

It names officials of the West Virginia Board of Medicine, which oversees the practice of medicine in the state and is tasked with enforcing the law, as defendants.

"We are ready to defend West Virginia's abortion law to the fullest," West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, a Republican, said in a statement.

West Virginia passed a near-total abortion ban in September, with exceptions only for medical emergencies, rape or incest. Doctors who violate it are subject to discipline or loss of their licenses, though not criminal penalties.

West Virginia is one of more than a dozen Republican-led states that have moved to restrict abortion since the U.S. Supreme Court last June overturned its landmark Roe v. Wade ruling, which had established a nationwide right to abortion in 1973.

The West Virginia law requires that any abortions allowed under one of its exceptions must be provided by a doctor with rights to admit a patient to a hospital. If the abortion is surgical, as opposed to one done by medication, it must also be performed in a hospital.

Wednesday's lawsuit argues that these restrictions violate the clinic's and patients' right to due process under the U.S. Constitution by imposing "irrational" barriers to medical treatment. It said there is no medical basis for imposing restrictions on abortion when there are no such restrictions on other, riskier procedures.

The lawsuit states that, under the law's own language, if any provision is unconstitutional, the entire law must be struck down.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.