🐂 Not all bull runs are created equal. November’s AI picks include 5 stocks up +20% eachUnlock Stocks

US court tries to bring SpaceX lawsuit against US labor board back to Texas

Published 02/26/2024, 05:55 PM
Updated 02/26/2024, 06:11 PM
© Reuters. SpaceX logo and Elon Musk silhouette are seen in this illustration taken, December 19, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
AMZN
-
SBUX
-

By Daniel Wiessner

(Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court in an unusual step on Monday moved to claw back rocket maker SpaceX's lawsuit claiming a U.S. labor board's structure is unconstitutional, after a judge in Texas granted the agency's request to send it to California.

A panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a brief order said the Los Angeles federal court should not have processed the transfer last week, days after the appeals court paused it pending an appeal by SpaceX.

But the 5th Circuit, which covers Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, has no power over the California court, so it ordered U.S. District Judge Rolando Olvera in Brownsville, Texas, who had transferred the case, to request that it be sent back to his court.

The fracas involves a technical issue but could have a major impact on SpaceX's case, as federal courts in Texas are generally seen as having more conservative judges who are more likely to be open to attempts to limit the powers of the federal government.

The 5th Circuit is seen by many as the most conservative U.S. appeals court while the 9th Circuit, which covers California, has the reputation of being among the most liberal.

SpaceX and the National Labor Relations Board did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

SpaceX filed the lawsuit one day after the labor board last month accused the company in an in-house proceeding of illegally firing engineers for criticizing CEO Elon Musk. SpaceX has denied wrongdoing.

Since then, Trader Joe's, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN) and Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX) have raised similar claims in cases pending at the labor board. The companies say the agency's in-house enforcement proceedings deprive them of the constitutional right to a jury trial, and that limits on the removal of administrative judges and the board's five presidentially-appointed members also violate the U.S. Constitution.

Olvera ruled last week that because SpaceX is headquartered in California and the events that triggered the case took place there, it made no sense for the lawsuit to proceed in Texas.

© Reuters. SpaceX logo and Elon Musk silhouette are seen in this illustration taken, December 19, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

SpaceX filed a petition with the 5th Circuit a day later seeking to reverse Olvera's ruling. The court last Monday paused the transfer, but the Los Angeles court continued to process it and assigned a judge and case number to the lawsuit later in the week.

The labor board in a filing in the California court on Friday said that if Olvera did request the return of the case, the court is not required to send it back if it determines that doing so would be inappropriate.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.