🐂 Not all bull runs are created equal. November’s AI picks include 5 stocks up +20% eachUnlock Stocks

Trump urges appeals judges to move hush money case to federal court

Published 10/14/2024, 09:25 PM
Updated 10/15/2024, 01:45 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Former President Donald Trump walks to make comments to members of the media after being found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the first degree at Manhattan Criminal Court, Thursday, May 30, 2024, in New York. Seth

By Luc Cohen

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Donald Trump's lawyers pushed on Monday to transfer to federal court the case in which he was convicted in a New York state court on charges involving covering up hush money paid to a porn star, a move that would give him the ability to end the prosecution if he regains the presidency.

His lawyers renewed the request in a brief filed with the Manhattan-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals as they appealed U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein's Sept. 3 ruling rejecting the shift to federal court. Trump was convicted in May of 34 felony counts of falsifying documents.

In their brief, Trump's lawyers cited the U.S. Supreme Court's July 1 decision that former president's cannot be prosecuted for official actions taken in office. In the hush money case, they said, jurors had improperly seen evidence of Trump's official acts as president.

His lawyers said the state charges intruded on the authority of the presidency under the U.S. Constitution.

Trump is the Republican candidate facing Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris in the Nov. 5 election. If he wins, he could seek to pardon himself for any federal crime or have his new Justice Department leadership dismiss any criminal cases pending against him in federal court. State criminal charges are beyond the reach of presidential pardon authority or Justice Department action.

Under U.S. law, civil or criminal cases pursued against federal officials may be moved to federal court if they relate to do their duties in office.

Trump's lawyers Todd Blanche and Emil Bove wrote that prosecutors' "use of official-acts evidence in grand jury proceedings and at trial violated the Constitution and threatens the ability of all future Presidents to fulfill that role."

Trump was convicted by a jury in May of falsifying business records to cover up a payment of $130,000 made by his former lawyer Michael Cohen to adult film actress Stormy Daniels for her silence before the 2016 election about a sexual encounter she has said she had with Trump a decade earlier. The case was brought by the office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat.

Trump denies the encounter with Daniels. He has vowed to appeal the verdict after his sentencing, which is scheduled for Nov. 26.

The Supreme Court's immunity ruling, arising from an appeal related to federal criminal charges against Trump over his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden, held that evidence of a former president's official acts cannot be used in criminal cases about otherwise personal conduct.

Trump's lawyers have argued that the Supreme Court's decision meant the hush money case should be dismissed. Trump pleaded not guilty in the Manhattan case and the federal election-related case.

Hellerstein denied Trump's request to move the hush money case to federal court, finding that the trial dealt with "private, unofficial acts, outside the bounds of executive authority."

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Former President Donald Trump walks to make comments to members of the media after being found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the first degree at Manhattan Criminal Court, Thursday, May 30, 2024, in New York. Seth Wenig/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

If the 2nd Circuit rules against Trump, he could ask the Supreme Court - whose 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices he nominated - to hear the matter.

A spokesperson for Bragg's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The 2nd Circuit has not given Bragg's office a deadline to respond to Trump's brief.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.