Trump CIA pick Ratcliffe faces Senate questions on politicized intelligence

Published 01/15/2025, 06:06 AM
Updated 01/15/2025, 10:53 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence, gestures as he departs with U.S. President Donald Trump on travel to West Point, New York from the South Lawn at the White House in Washington, U.S., December 12, 2020. REUTERS/Cheriss May/Fil
MCOTc1
-

By Jonathan Landay

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Senate intelligence committee opened a confirmation hearing on Wednesday for President-elect Donald Trump's nominee to be CIA director, John Ratcliffe, a former Republican lawmaker who was accused of using intelligence for political ends as the nation’s top spy during the incoming U.S. leader’s first term.

Ratcliffe is all but certain to win the Republican-run Senate's approval to lead the premier U.S. intelligence agency as the United States grapples with China, Russia’s war in Ukraine and growing ties between the two nuclear powers, Iran and North Korea.

But the hearing also will replay allegations that Ratcliffe allowed politics to interfere with his work as Trump’s director of national intelligence from 2020 to 2021, said a Senate aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The opening statement of the panel’s top Democrat, Mark Warner, appeared to reflect those concerns, with the lawmaker to ask Ratcliffe to pledge to "always seek to provide unbiased, unvarnished and timely intelligence assessments."

“I need your assurance this intelligence will represent the best judgment of the CIA, regardless of political implications or views,” Warner will tell Ratcliffe according to advance excerpts seen by Reuters.

He also will ask Ratcliffe to pledge not to "fire or force out" CIA employees for "their perceived political views" or to "place loyalty to a political figure above loyalty to country."

In advanced excerpts from his opening statement, the Republican committee chairman, Senator Tom Cotton, criticized the U.S. intelligence community for what he said were failures to warn of "anticipated major events or detected impending attacks."

Those included a New Year's Day truck ramming attack in New Orleans by an alleged Islamic State adherent that killed 14 people, the sudden fall in December of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to rebel forces and Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, onslaught into Israel, said Cotton.

“While this goes for the entire intelligence community, this problem is especially acute at the CIA - which remains, after all, the Central Intelligence Agency. The CIA needs to get back to its roots, but must overcome several challenges to do so," he said, according to the excerpts.

Taking aim at the CIA, Cotton charged that the agency has neglected its core mission of stealing secrets, built too much bureaucracy, "politicized" intelligence to fit outgoing President Joe Biden's "policy preferences," and "needs to become bolder and more innovative in covert action."

The Trump transition team did not respond to requests for comment on the hearing.

Ratcliffe “will be a fearless fighter for the Constitutional Rights of all Americans, while assuring the Highest Levels of National Security and PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH," Trump said in a Nov. 12 statement announcing his nominee for CIA director.

The concerns with Ratcliffe center on charges by former U.S. intelligence officials and Democrats that he made public unverified Russian intelligence in September 2020 to aid Trump, who was in a re-election fight that he lost to his Democratic opponent, Biden. Ratcliffe's office denied this charge.

In a letter to a senator, Ratcliffe said a Russian intelligence analysis alleged that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who lost the 2016 election to Trump, had approved a plan to create “a scandal” by tying Trump to Russian President Vladimir Putin and a Russian hacking operation of the Democratic National Committee.

© Reuters. Former director of National Intelligence (DNI) John Ratcliffe, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's nominee to be director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), testifies before a Senate (Select) Intelligence Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., January 15, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis

The then-heads of the CIA and the National Security Agency opposed releasing the material that Ratcliffe himself noted was unverified and “may reflect exaggeration or fabrication.”

The material contradicted a 2017 U.S. intelligence assessment, a special prosecutor’s findings, and a bipartisan Senate intelligence committee report that Russia used hacking and other means to try to sway the 2016 vote to Trump.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.