👀 Ones to watch: Undervalued stocks to buy before they report Q3 earningsSee Undervalued Stocks

Georgia judge blocks rule requiring hand-count of election ballots

Published 10/15/2024, 09:38 PM
Updated 10/16/2024, 04:51 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Cobb County resident enters the King Spring Baptist Church voting precinct to cast their ballot during the Georgia Presidential Primary Election, in Smyrna, Georgia, U.S., March 12, 2024.  REUTERS/Alyssa Pointer/File Photo

By Jack Queen

(Reuters) -A Georgia judge on Tuesday temporarily halted a new rule requiring poll workers to hand count ballots in the Nov. 5 election, in a defeat for Donald Trump, whose Republican allies pushed the change after he lost the battleground state in 2020.

The hand-count rule was passed on Sept. 20 by a pro-Trump conservative majority of Georgia's election board, who said they were attempting to make the Nov. 5 election more secure and transparent.

Democrats had said the change would sow chaos and delay results.

Georgia, where early voting began in record numbers on Tuesday, is one of seven states likely to determine the presidential contest between Trump and his Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris. In 2020, Trump made false claims of widespread voting fraud in the state.

Judge Robert McBurney said in his decision on Tuesday that it was appropriate to pause the vote counting rule because it introduced fresh uncertainty into the process just weeks before Election Day.

"Anything that adds uncertainty and disorder to the electoral process disserves the public," according to a copy of the decision posted by Democracy Docket, a website founded by Democratic lawyer Marc Elias that tracks election cases.

"The administrative chaos that will - not may - ensue is entirely inconsistent with the obligations of our boards of elections (and the State Election Board) to ensure that our elections are fair, legal, and orderly," the judge wrote.

Representatives of the Georgia State Election Board and Republican National Committee did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Tuesday.

The judge did not say the rule was illegal but that it was appropriate to pause it pending further review. An appeals court could potentially reverse the decision.

The decision was not immediately available on the court's online docket on Tuesday night.

Democrats hailed McBurney's ruling as a win for voters.

"From the beginning, this rule was an effort to delay election results to sow doubt in the outcome, and our democracy is stronger thanks to this decision to block it," party officials said in a statement provided by the Harris campaign.

'OPPORTUNITY FOR ERROR'

The lawsuit was filed on Oct. 2 by Cobb County Board of Elections and Registration and joined by the Democratic National Committee, which intervened in the case.

Also on Tuesday, McBurney ruled in a separate case that local election officials in Georgia are required to certify results, rejecting an argument that counties could refuse to do so if they had concerns about the voting process.

The hand-count rule would require three poll workers in each of the state's more than 6,500 precincts to open the sealed boxes of ballots scanned by machines and conduct a hand count, starting as soon as election night.

Voting rights groups had said the rule could allow rogue county election board members to delay or deny certification of election results, throwing the state's vote into chaos, while the state attorney general's office warned the board was likely exceeding its statutory authority.

The board's 3-2 vote was pushed through by three allies of Trump.

Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, the state's top election official, said ahead of the Sept. 20 meeting during which the rule was passed that it would introduce "the opportunity for error, lost or stolen ballots, and fraud."

Janelle King, a Republican member of the elections board, said during the meeting that the hand count was needed to ensure accuracy, even if that meant results would be delayed.

"What I don’t want to do is set a precedent that we are okay with speed over accuracy," King said.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Cobb County resident enters the King Spring Baptist Church voting precinct to cast their ballot during the Georgia Presidential Primary Election, in Smyrna, Georgia, U.S., March 12, 2024.  REUTERS/Alyssa Pointer/File Photo

There is pending litigation over other changes by the board, including rules empowering local officials to investigate discrepancies in vote totals and conduct "reasonable inquiries" into irregularities before certifying the results.

Trump faces criminal charges accusing him of pressuring Georgia officials to reverse his 2020 election loss, though he denies wrongdoing. He has pleaded not guilty.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.