Factbox-State supreme court elections will shape fights over redistricting, abortion

Published 11/09/2022, 07:38 PM
Updated 11/10/2022, 05:06 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Abortion rights supporters walk past the Washington Monument as they march from the U.S. Supreme Court to the White House after the court ruled in the Dobbs v Women's Health Organization abortion case, overturning the landmark Roe v Wade abort

By Joseph Ax

(Reuters) - The outcome of state supreme court races in Tuesday's midterm elections could have profound consequences for control of the U.S. Congress in the future, as well as abortion rights in several states.

The races, typically a political afterthought, emerged as electoral battlegrounds this year, especially after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in June to eliminate a nationwide right to abortion.

Here's a rundown of the results from pivotal states:

NORTH CAROLINA

Two Republican challengers, Trey Allen and Richard Dietz, defeated Democratic incumbent Sam Ervin and Democratic candidate Lucy Inman, flipping control of the state's highest court from a 4-3 Democratic edge to a 5-2 Republican majority.

In a split decision along party lines, the current court had invalidated Republican-drawn legislative and congressional maps as illegally partisan, tossing out a redistricting plan that likely would have handed Republicans at least 10 of the state's 14 U.S. House seats. Instead, a redrawn map the court deemed less biased resulted in an even 7-7 split on Tuesday.

But the redistricting decision only applied to this year, and Republican lawmakers who control the state's legislature could seek to muscle through another partisan map in time for the 2024 election if they believe the court's new conservative majority will be less inclined to strike it down.

The new court could also look more favorably on abortion restrictions, although North Carolina's Democratic governor, Roy Cooper, holds veto power over legislation.

OHIO

The partisan makeup of Ohio's top court will remain 4-3 in favor of Republicans, after Republicans swept all three races on Tuesday's ballot. But the retirement of Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor, who sided with the court's three Democrats in several rulings, could push the court to the right.

In particular, O'Connor was part of the majority that issued several 4-3 rulings this year finding that Republican-backed legislative and congressional maps illegally disfavored Democrats. The maps remained in use for this year, and the court's conservative majority will have the power to review redrawn maps for 2024.

The new court is also likely to hear a challenge to the state's six-week abortion ban, with litigation working its way through lower courts.

OTHER STATES

The races in Illinois drew the most campaign spending by far, according to the nonprofit Brennan Center for Justice at New York University. Business interests had hoped Republicans could reverse a slim Democratic majority, but Democrats held the court after the party asserted that abortion rights could be endangered if conservatives had control.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Abortion rights supporters walk past the Washington Monument as they march from the U.S. Supreme Court to the White House after the court ruled in the Dobbs v Women's Health Organization abortion case, overturning the landmark Roe v Wade abortion decision, in Washington, U.S., June 26, 2022. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo

In Kansas, six of the seven justices won the right to remain on the bench, likely ensuring the court's 2019 decision upholding a state constitutional right to abortion will be preserved. Voters earlier this year rejected a measure that would have explicitly made abortion unconstitutional.

Michigan's court will remain controlled by Democratic-aligned justices after two incumbents won re-election. The court had been expected to weigh in on the state's 1931 abortion ban, but voters approved a referendum enshrining abortion rights in the state constitution, effectively making the law moot.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.