Selloff or Market Correction? Either Way, Here's What to Do NextSee Overvalued Stocks

Democrats sue Georgia over election rules that could 'invite chaos'

Published 08/26/2024, 08:16 PM
Updated 08/26/2024, 08:35 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Elections signage is displayed outside of the King Spring Baptist Church voting precinct during the Georgia Presidential Primary Election, in Smyrna, Georgia, U.S., March 12, 2024.  REUTERS/Alyssa Pointer/File Photo

By Brad Brooks

(Reuters) - Democrats sued Georgia state election officials on Monday, alleging new rules that could allow local officials to delay certification of November's presidential results were illegal.

The lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County by local Georgia Democratic politicians, the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Party of Georgia. It says the rules approved by the Republican-controlled Georgia state election board this month were intended to give individual county election officials the ability to delay or cancel the certification of votes.

The lawsuit says the new rules "introduce substantial uncertainty in the post-election process and - if interpreted as their drafters have suggested - invite chaos by establishing new processes at odds with existing statutory duties."

The Georgia Secretary of State's office, which oversees the board, did not respond to requests for comment.

Last week, the five-member Georgia election board, which includes three conservative members championed by Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, voted 3-2 to empower county election board members to investigate any discrepancies between the number of cast ballots and the number of voters in each precinct before certification.

Such mismatches are not uncommon and are not typically evidence of fraud, according to voting rights advocates, who say that rule could permit individual board members to intentionally delay approval of the results.

The board has also in recent weeks approved a separate rule that county election boards conduct a "reasonable inquiry" into any irregularities before certifying the results. The rule did not define "reasonable" or set a particular deadline for completing the inquiry.

The Democrats' lawsuit says it is established law that it is the responsibility of the judicial system, not individual county election officials, to resolve allegations of voter fraud.

Trump has falsely claimed for years that the 2020 election was rigged by fraud.

His infamous January 2021 phone call in which he asked Georgia's top election official, Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, to "find" enough votes to sway the outcome helped lead to Trump's pending indictment on state charges.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Elections signage is displayed outside of the King Spring Baptist Church voting precinct during the Georgia Presidential Primary Election, in Smyrna, Georgia, U.S., March 12, 2024.  REUTERS/Alyssa Pointer/File Photo

Voter fraud in the U.S. is vanishingly rare, research shows.

Trump faces Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate, in the Nov. 5 election. Polls show a close race, with Georgia among seven states likely to determine the outcome.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.