Selloff or Market Correction? Either Way, Here's What to Do NextSee Overvalued Stocks

Arizona House lawmakers vote to repeal 1864 abortion ban

Published 04/24/2024, 02:54 PM
Updated 04/25/2024, 02:07 PM
© Reuters. Arizona State Rep. Austin Smith speaks with fellow legislators before the Arizona State Legislature House Democrats try again to repeal an 1864 law that bans nearly all abortions, during a session in the state legislature in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S. April 2

(This April 24 story has been corrected to indicate that grassroots voters were concerned with losing Arizona legislative races, and not with the presidential election, in paragraph 15)

By Brad Brooks

(Reuters) - Lawmakers in Arizona's House of Representatives on Wednesday voted to repeal an 1864 ban on abortion that could still go into effect within weeks if not also knocked down by the Senate.

House lawmakers voted 32-28 to repeal the law, which provides no exceptions for abortions even in cases of rape or incest. Three Republicans crossed party lines to join all 29 Democrats in voting for the repeal.

The Arizona Senate, where Republicans hold a slim 16-14 majority, could vote on the measure as early as May 1.

"I'm thrilled the House has finally decided to do the right thing and repeal the archaic 1864 near-total abortion ban," Governor Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, wrote on social media. Hobbs has said she will sign a repeal of the ban if it passes the House and the Senate.

"The decision to get an abortion, or seek any type of reproductive healthcare, belongs in the hands of patients, their families and their providers, not politicians," Democratic Representative Oscar De Los Santos told reporters before Wednesday's session began.

For the past two weeks, Republicans in the House had blocked Democrats from repealing the law. Speaker of the House Ben Toma, a Republican, said he was disappointed that "Democrats apparently believe that abortion should occur with no limits and no regulations."

"I fervently disagree with those who advocate for extremism through unlimited, unrestricted and unregulated abortions," Toma added.

Representative Matt Gress was the only Republican to side with Democrats in last week's failed effort to repeal the abortion ban, but he was joined by two other Republicans on Wednesday.

"As someone who is both pro-life and the product of strong women in my life, I refuse to buy into the false notion pushed by the extremes on both sides of this issue that we cannot respect and protect women and defend new life at the same time," Gress wrote on social media after the vote.

Arizona's fight over the Civil War-era abortion ban is the latest flashpoint on women's reproductive rights in the United States since the Supreme Court ended the constitutional right to abortion in 2022, leaving it up to states to decide the issue. Conservative-led states quickly invoked strict bans on abortion within their borders.

The old law was revived by a state Supreme Court ruling on April 9, and unless the legislature intervenes, it could take effect within 60 days of that ruling, the state's Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat, has said.

Even if Democrats in Arizona manage to repeal the 1864 abortion ban, restrictions on the procedure would still be in place. In 2022, Arizona passed a law that bans abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Democrats across the U.S., confident that public opinion is on their side in supporting abortion rights, have sought to elevate the issue, especially ahead of November's presidential election. Arizona, sharply split between Democrats and Republicans, is a key battleground state in the presidential election.

Republicans who voted to uphold the 1864 law criticized Democrats and the three Republicans who repealed it, saying they did so only for political expediency.

Representative Alexander Kolodin, a Republican, said that some grassroots conservative voters had pressured members of his party to repeal the abortion ban out of concerns that not doing so would mean Republicans would lose legislative races in the autumn.

"What are we talking about doing in this chamber in exchange for winning that election?" Kolodin said. "We're talking about killing infants. We're willing to kill infants in order to win an election."

But Representative Stephanie Stahl Hamilton, a Democrat who authored the one-sentence bill to repeal the old law, said it was clear most people in Arizona didn't want the law on the books.

© Reuters. Arizona State Rep. Stephanie Stahl Hamilton is hugged by Arizona State Sen. Anna Hernandez after Arizona House Democrats repealed an 1864 law that bans nearly all abortions, during a state legislative session at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S. April 24, 2024. REUTERS/Rebecca Noble

"The people of Arizona are waiting for us to get this done," Stahl Hamilton said ahead of the vote.

With or without repealing the 1864 law, Arizona Democrats are also attempting to place a ballot measure before voters in November that would restore abortion rights.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.