🎈 Up Big Today: Find today's biggest gainers (some over 50%!) with our free screenerTry Stock Screener

U.S. Supreme Court cancels arguments in Republican bid to keep border expulsions

Published 02/16/2023, 02:39 PM
Updated 02/16/2023, 06:37 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: News media gather outside the front of the U.S. Supreme Court building prior to a photo opportunity that will follow the official investiture ceremony for the court's newest Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson prior to the start of the cou

By Andrew Chung

(Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday canceled scheduled arguments in a case in which Republicans sought to keep in place a policy introduced under former President Donald Trump that has let American officials quickly expel hundreds of thousands of migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border.

The policy, known as Title 42, was implemented by Trump's administration in March 2020 - early in the COVID-19 pandemic - as a measure tied to a public health emergency.

The justices removed it from their argument calendar after the Justice Department told them on Feb. 7 the case would become moot because Title 42 will expire in light of an announcement by President Joe Biden's administration that the recognition of a COVID-19 public health emergency will end effective May 11.

The justices were due to hear the case on March 1. Nixing the Republican legal action lessens the chances of keeping the policy in place.

Biden, a Democrat, had kept Title 42 in place after taking office in January 2021 despite fierce criticism from within his own party. Republicans have criticized Biden's border policies as weak, blaming him for the high numbers of migrants trying to cross into the United States.

At issue in the case, which the court agreed to hear in December, was whether a group of Republican state attorneys general may intervene to defend the Title 42 expulsions after U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan in November ruled the public health order unlawful in a lawsuit by asylum-seeking migrant families.

The Supreme Court voted 5-4 in December to keep in place the Title 42 policy, putting on hold Sullivan's decision.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: News media gather outside the front of the U.S. Supreme Court building prior to a photo opportunity that will follow the official investiture ceremony for the court's newest Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson prior to the start of the court's 2022-2023 term in Washington, U.S. September 30, 2022.  REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Biden's administration sought to lift the policy after U.S. health authorities said last year it was no longer needed to prevent the spread of COVID-19, but the effort was blocked by a federal judge in Louisiana.

A federal appeals court denied a separate request by Republican state officials to intervene in the litigation to try to preserve Title 42. The officials appealed that decision to the Supreme Court, telling the justices that ending Title 42 would lead to an increase in U.S.-Mexico border crossings resulting in significant new financial burdens for the states.

 

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.