Selloff or Market Correction? Either Way, Here's What to Do NextSee Overvalued Stocks

US patent tribunal sides with Intel again in $2.2 billion VLSI case

Published 06/13/2023, 06:05 PM
Updated 06/14/2023, 04:21 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A smartphone with a displayed Intel logo is placed on a computer motherboard in this illustration taken March 6, 2023. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/file photo
INTC
-

By Blake Brittain

(Reuters) - A U.S. Patent Office tribunal ruled for Intel Corp (NASDAQ:INTC) on Tuesday on the chipmaking giant's bid to invalidate a patent that represented $1.5 billion of a $2.18 billion verdict it lost to VLSI Technology LLC in 2021.

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board invalidated the computer chip-related patent after canceling another VLSI patent that accounted for the remainder of the Texas federal court verdict last month.

VLSI can appeal both decisions to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

An Intel spokesperson said the company was pleased with the decisions to invalidate both of VLSI's "low-quality" patents. Representatives for VLSI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

VLSI, a patent holding company that has brought several infringement lawsuits against Intel, won a separate verdict worth $949 million against the chipmaker in Texas last year. A jury ruled for Intel in 2021 in another Texas patent case in which VLSI had sought $3.1 billion in damages.

The companies agreed to dismiss another VLSI lawsuit in Delaware in December. A trial in a related case is scheduled to begin in Northern California next year.

VLSI is owned by investment funds managed by SoftBank Group Corp subsidiary Fortress Investment Group.

The patent board proceeding decided on Tuesday was initiated by South Dakota-based Patent Quality Assurance LLC. An attorney for Patent Quality Assurance did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The other patent from the $2.18 billion verdict was challenged by a separate entity called OpenSky Industries LLC. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director Kathi Vidal sanctioned OpenSky last year after finding it tried to extort both Intel and VLSI, but allowed the proceeding to continue with Intel leading it.

The case is Patent Quality Assurance LLC v. VLSI Technology LLC, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, No. IPR2021-01229.

For PQA and Intel: Benjamin Fernandez of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr; and Bruce Slayden of Slayden Grubert Beard

For VLSI: Babak Redjaian of Irell & Manella; and Kenneth Weatherwax of Lowenstein & Weatherwax

Read more:

USPTO director sanctions patent challenger in $2.1 bln Intel dispute

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A smartphone with a displayed Intel logo is placed on a computer motherboard in this illustration taken March 6, 2023. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/file photo

Intel hit with $949 mln U.S. verdict in VLSI computer chip patent trial

Intel loses U.S. patent trial, ordered to pay $2.18 billion to VLSI Tech

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.