⭐ Start off 2025 with a powerful boost to your portfolio: January’s freshest AI-picked stocksUnlock stocks

US needs to crack down on Chinese chipmaker SMIC, Republican lawmaker says

Published 11/05/2024, 10:03 AM
Updated 11/05/2024, 10:07 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A man visits a booth of Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), at China International Semiconductor Expo in Shanghai, China October 14, 2020. REUTERS/Aly Song/File Photo

By Karen Freifeld

(Reuters) - A top Republican lawmaker has accused the Biden administration of not doing enough to prevent China's Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC) from strengthening the country's chipmaking industry and military-industrial complex.

Michael McCaul, chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, urged U.S. Commerce Department agents to visit SMIC's facilities and check whether the company is illegally producing chips for Huawei, the sanctioned telecommunications company seen as a national champion within China's chip industry.

In a Nov. 4 letter seen by Reuters, McCaul described what he called "growing bipartisan frustration" that the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) had not acted on reports of Huawei's efforts to evade U.S. export controls.

"There is growing evidence that SMIC is violating U.S. export control laws," McCaul wrote to BIS under secretary Alan Estevez. If China is not willing to immediately agree to a "comprehensive audit of all SMIC facilities and its books," McCaul said, "BIS should pause all existing licenses for SMIC."

McCaul said SMIC's breakthroughs - including its advanced chip in a Huawei smartphone, and expected production of over a million AI processors for Huawei - are a "smoking gun" for a violation and could help China surpass the U.S. in artificial intelligence.

The Commerce Department said it had received McCaul's letter and would respond through "appropriate channels." Last week, in response to similar criticism, it said that no Commerce Department had been tougher on China.

SMIC did not immediately respond to requests for comment, nor did Huawei.

The Chinese embassy in Washington said in a statement that "certain U.S. politicians" were "overstretching the concept of national security" and politicizing "science and technology and economic and trade issues."

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A man visits a booth of Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), at China International Semiconductor Expo in Shanghai, China October 14, 2020. REUTERS/Aly Song/File Photo

SMIC was added to the Commerce Department's restricted trade list in 2020 for alleged ties to the Chinese military industrial complex. A year earlier, Huawei was placed on the list after alleged sanctions violations. Both companies have previously denied wrongdoing.

Being on the "Entity List," as it's called, usually bars U.S. shipments to targeted firms. But when the Trump administration added Huawei and SMIC, their rules allowed exporters to get licenses to ship billions of dollars in U.S. goods and technology to them.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.