US Justice Dept questions landmark NCAA athlete pay settlement

Published 01/17/2025, 06:40 PM
Updated 01/17/2025, 06:55 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The seal of the U.S. Justice Department is seen on the podium in the Department's headquarters briefing room before a news conference with the Attorney General in Washington, January 24, 2023. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

By Mike Scarcella

(Reuters) -The U.S. Justice Department on Friday questioned the fairness of a private $2.8 billion settlement with the National Collegiate Athletic Association, suggesting it might not go far enough to compensate student athletes.

The Biden administration expressed its views in a filing in the federal court in Oakland, California, where the NCAA has been mired in class action litigation with students for years.

The settlement, which requires court approval, would be among the largest-ever recoveries in a class action and allows NCAA member schools to make payments directly to student athletes for the first time.

In addition to the $2.8 billion settlement fund, academic institutions are expected to pay out some $20 billion over the next decade under the terms of the deal.

Justice Department antitrust officials said in their filing that they were concerned about a provision of the 10-year settlement that caps money available for schools to pay athletes.

The filing said, "while the proposed settlement allows for some relief, it still functions as an artificial price cap on what free market competition may otherwise yield."

It urged the court to reject the settlement or require language that makes clear that the cap does not bar or apply to potential future lawsuits.

The NCAA in a statement said the "settlement reached on behalf of hundreds of thousands of student-athletes is consistent with antitrust law and will create a new era of college sports."

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Justice Department is not a party in the lawsuit. The NCAA denied wrongdoing in agreeing to settle.

In a statement, a lead attorney for the plaintiffs, Steve Berman, defended the settlement and said its terms and conditions were clear.

Berman said failure to approve the deal “would scuttle billions of dollars going to student athletes.”

U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken will weigh final approval of the settlement at a hearing in April.

The case is In re College Athlete NIL Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 4:20-cv-03919-CW.

Read more:

Lawyers in NCAA athlete pay settlement ask for $515 mln legal fee award

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The seal of the U.S. Justice Department is seen on the podium in the Department's headquarters briefing room before a news conference with the Attorney General in Washington, January 24, 2023. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

NCAA’s $2.7 bln student athlete settlement wins preliminary court approval

NCAA's $2.7 billion settlement faces objections from some students

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.