Final hours! Save up to 55% OFF InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Lawmakers grill U.S. FDA on response to Abbott baby formula safety

Published 05/25/2022, 12:29 PM
Updated 05/25/2022, 04:46 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Empty shelves show a shortage of baby formula at a CVS store in San Antonio, Texas, U.S. May 10, 2022. REUTERS/Kaylee Greenlee Beal/File Photo
ABT
-

By Ahmed Aboulenein and Manas Mishra

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Lawmakers grilled U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials on Wednesday over what they saw as a lack of urgency in the agency's response to complaints about possible baby formula contamination at a now shuttered Abbott Laboratories (NYSE:ABT) plant that led to severe nationwide shortages.

FDA leaders appeared before a congressional panel to answer questions about the crisis after Abbott in February recalled some products and closed its manufacturing plant in Sturgis, Michigan.

"There are also questions surrounding the timeline of FDA's investigation and response," said Representative Diana DeGette, chairwoman of the U.S. House of Representatives Commerce and Energy Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

The Democrat cited "a four-month lapse before returning to inspect the Sturgis facility," and a delay in contacting a former Abbott employee whistleblower.

Senior leaders like then-acting Commissioner Janet Woodcock and Deputy Commissioner for Food Policy and Response Frank Yiannas only saw the complaint in February because of pandemic-related mail routing issues, FDA officials said.

"FDA's timeliness of interviewing the whistleblower and getting into the facility for a for-cause inspection were too slow and some decisions could have been more optimal," acknowledged FDA Commissioner Robert Califf.

"To my knowledge, there's no malfeasance there. These are people who are working very hard, but we had systems that were failing and decisions that could have been better."

The FDA inspected the plant following reports of bacterial infections in babies potentially linked to Abbott's formula, and the whistleblower complaint in late October.

A COVID outbreak at the plant delayed the inspection until Jan. 31. A second baby's death potentially linked to the plant was reported just after the factory was shuttered in February.

"Frankly, the inspection results were shocking," Califf said, noting that inspectors found cracks in vital equipment, a lack of adequate hand washing, evidence of previous bacterial contamination, and water leaks in areas were formula is produced, a risk factor for bacteria.

The plant is one of three run by Abbott, which has the largest U.S. market share for infant formula, and the company did not have a contingency plan to produce its specialty formulas that serve as the only source of nutrition for thousands of babies with metabolic disorders, the FDA said.

Califf said the best option was to enter into a consent decree agreement with Abbott, "where we literally have oversight of every single step" of remediation of problems at the facility to get it back on line as soon as possible.

Abbott plans to reopen the plant on June 4.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Shelves for baby and toddler formula are partially empty, as the quantity a shopper can buy is limited amid continuing U.S. shortages, at a grocery store in Medford, Massachusetts, U.S., May 17, 2022.   REUTERS/Brian Snyder/File Photo

Abbott controlled 40% of the market before the plant closed, Christopher Calamari, president of Abbott U.S. nutrition, told lawmakers, and the plant accounts for 40% of Abbott's product.

Reckitt Benckriser had a 34% market share that grew to 56% since the closure, vice president for nutrition Robert Cleveland told lawmakers. Nestle saw its 8% share grow to 9%, Gerber vice president Scott Fitz said.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.