💎 Fed’s first rate cut since 2020 set to trigger market. Find undervalued gems with Fair ValueSee Undervalued Stocks

U.S. audit regulator levied only $6.5 million in fines in 16 years: study

Published 09/05/2019, 05:19 PM
Updated 09/05/2019, 05:31 PM
U.S. audit regulator levied only $6.5 million in fines in 16 years: study

By Katanga Johnson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A top U.S. accounting watchdog has brought only 18 enforcement actions and levied just $6.5 million in fines against the Big Four accounting firms in its 16-year existence, according to a study published on Thursday.

The report by the Project On Government Oversight (POGO) claims the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), which oversees audit firms that are supposed to help keep publicly traded companies in check, is falling down on the job.

The report could increase pressure on the agency, which in recent years has been criticized for being too close to the industry it oversees and slow to ensure the industry performed its job.

The Washington-based group's analysis of 16 years' of PCAOB inspection reports on the U.S. arms of the Big Four audit firms - Deloitte & Touche, Ernst & Young, PricewaterhouseCoopers and KPMG - found the regulator identified 808 instances in which the firms issued defective audits.

But the agency has only brought 18 enforcement cases related to 21 audits against the Big Four. The Big Four audit 99% of companies in the S&P 500, according to POGO.

"The Project on Government Oversight chooses to focus only on our enforcement program, giving the impression that it is the sole means by which we fulfill our statutory mandate. This is incorrect," said PCAOB spokeswoman Torrie Matous in a statement

Created by the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act as a private-sector nonprofit corporation, the PCAOB is tasked with policing the accounting firms that sign off on the books of the nation's listed companies. Sarbanes-Oxley aimed to tighten controls on the auditing industry following a string of accounting scandals, most notably the 2001 collapse of energy company Enron Corp.

Thursday's study comes after a long-anticipated shake-up at the regulator in January 2018 that led to the replacement of James Doty as the chairman and the appointment of four new board members. Unlike many other agency roles, the chairman of the PCAOB does not require confirmation by the Senate.

POGO's report did not provide any breakdown of enforcement actions taken when Doty was the chairman and after he was replaced.

According to the report, under its powers the agency could have fined the Big Four a minimum of $1.6 billion, but public records indicate fines of only $6.5 million.

"It's unacceptable that the agency is taking such a light-handed approach in holding these large audit firms accountable," said POGO's executive director, Danielle Brian. "Exercising financial penalties against these firms might be the only way to get this industry on track. By failing to hold the Big Four accountable, the board is putting all Americans’ financial futures in jeopardy."

The Securities and Exchange Commission oversees the PCAOB and also has the authority to inspect and fine auditors in breach of the rules. It has brought steep fines in the past.

Some industry advocates and former PCAOB board members say the regulator should not be held to the same standard as the SEC and that its primary function is not to bring enforcement actions but to help raise the quality of audits.

In its report, POGO cites Matous as saying that due to resource constraints the regulator is selective about the enforcement cases it pursues.

"All of our activities must be taken into account for a complete and accurate picture of the PCAOB’s work to hold audit firms accountable and drive improvement in audit quality,” Matous said on Thursday, adding that the agency's mission includes preventing, deterring and remediating audit deficiencies.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.