💎 Fed’s first rate cut since 2020 set to trigger market. Find undervalued gems with Fair ValueSee Undervalued Stocks

U.S. judge separates Rajaratnam and Chiesi trials

Published 12/10/2010, 05:26 PM
Updated 12/10/2010, 05:28 PM

* Galleon hedge fund founder to go on trial Feb. 28

* Former trader Chiesi's trial begins April 25

* Case is part of widening insider trading probe at funds

NEW YORK, Dec 10 (Reuters) - Galleon hedge fund founder Raj Rajaratnam and his principal co-defendant in a broad probe of insider trading at hedge funds will have separate trials on securities fraud and conspiracy charges, a U.S. judge ordered on Friday.

Both Rajaratnam and Danielle Chiesi, a former trader at New Castle Funds LLC in New York, had been scheduled to go on trial together on Jan. 17 in what U.S. prosecutors have described as the biggest probe of hedge funds in the United States.

Rajaratnam's trial would begin on Feb. 28 and Chiesi's trial on April 25, U.S. District Judge Richard Holwell said in a written order.

Rajaratnam and Chiesi both pleaded not guilty to the charges following their arrest on Oct. 16, 2009. The Sri Lankan-born Rajaratnam, once considered a billionaire, had since his arrest been the central figure in an investigation of hedge funds that has since widened.

Prosecutors initially focused on two overlapping networks of people allegedly trading on confidential tips about mostly tech stocks.

On Nov. 24, Rajaratnam and Chiesi lost their bid to suppress as evidence at trial the FBI's secretly-recorded conversations of them in the investigation. [ID:nN24231045]

Rajaratnam and Chiesi face up to 20 years in prison if convicted. Both are free on bail pending the trials. Rajaratnam and Chiesi made about $53 million combined in profits from illegal trades, prosecutors have said.

At least two dozen former hedge fund managers, lawyers, traders and others have faced criminal or civil charges in the case. Fourteen have pleaded guilty to criminal charges, and 11 of them agreed to cooperate with prosecutors. One is at large.

The case is USA v Rajaratnam et al, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 10-01184. (Reporting by Grant McCool; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.