🎈 Up Big Today: Find today's biggest gainers with our free screenerTry Stock Screener

Two US states sue Glock over machine gun conversion

Published 12/12/2024, 01:44 PM
Updated 12/12/2024, 01:55 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Handguns are displayed at the Glock, Inc. booth at Special Operations Forces (SOF) Week for defense companies, in Tampa, Florida, U.S., May 7, 2024.  REUTERS/Luke Sharrett/File Photo

By Tom Hals

(Reuters) - Attorneys general in Minnesota and New Jersey sued Glock on Thursday, accusing the company of making handguns that are easily modified to fire as illegal machine guns through a cheap add-on known as a “Glock switch.”

The lawsuits said that the $20 switches transform Glock handguns into easily concealable weapons that can fire 1,200 rounds per minute, recklessly endangering the public.

The gun maker has known for decades that its weapons are uniquely receptive to the switches and has not taken steps to change its design, according to the lawsuits.

Glock did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Machine guns, which federal law defines as guns that can shoot more than once with a single trigger pull, are strictly regulated under federal law.

The two lawsuits are the first actions taken by a newly formed partnership of Democratic attorneys general from 15 states and the District of Columbia seeking to hold firearms companies liable for gun violence.

The attorneys general said they intend to reduce gun violence by coordinating their enforcement of state civil liability and consumer protection laws.

Gun businesses are broadly protected from liability by federal law, but gun control advocates have been probing ways to use state laws as a workaround.

The strategy was most successful in litigation against Remington Arms, which agreed in 2022 to pay $73 million to families of victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre.

Both lawsuits on Thursday accused Glock of creating a public nuisance and of violating various product liability and consumer protection laws.

The lawsuits seek court orders requiring Glock to disgorge profits and to pay restitution, although amounts were not specified.

The Minnesota case also sought an injunction directing Glock to design safer handguns, and New Jersey asked the court to prevent the company from distributing easily modified guns in the state.

Glock was sued earlier this year by the city of Chicago, which said its police recovered more than 1,100 Glock pistols with the modification between 2021 and 2023.

Glock pistols are the most commonly used gun in crimes in the city, according to the Chicago lawsuit. That case is ongoing in state court.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Handguns are displayed at the Glock, Inc. booth at Special Operations Forces (SOF) Week for defense companies, in Tampa, Florida, U.S., May 7, 2024.  REUTERS/Luke Sharrett/File Photo

In June, the U.S. Supreme Court declared unlawful a ban on "bump stocks" that enable semiautomatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns.

Several legal battles are underway testing the limits of gun restrictions after the Supreme Court's 2022 decision expanding gun rights.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.