Final hours! Save up to 55% OFF InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Toyota, Honda, Nissan get Greenpeace thumbs-down for decarbonisation efforts

Published 09/08/2022, 01:39 AM
Updated 09/08/2022, 06:06 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: An exhaust emits fumes as a car is driven through Richmond in London, Britain December 2, 2016.  REUTERS/Peter Nicholls/File Photo/File Photo
GM
-
TM
-
NSANY
-

TOKYO (Reuters) -Japanese automakers Toyota Motor (NYSE:TM) Corp, Honda Motor Co and Nissan (OTC:NSANY) Motor CO ranked at the bottom of a new Greenpeace study on 10 automakers' decarbonisation efforts, the environmental group said on Thursday.

Greenpeace ranked Toyota last out of the top 10 automakers in sales volume - the same as last year - and pointed out that zero-emission vehicles made up less than 1% of the company's sales and noted slow progress in supply chain decarbonisation.

It is a remarkable change of fortune for the world's largest carmaker by sales, considering its Prius hybrid, released almost a quarter century ago and a darling for environmentalists.

The Japanese automaker is now a frequent target of criticism from activists and green investors, who slam it for not embracing battery electric vehicles (BEVs) fast enough.

"The time for hybrids, I think, has finished," said Daniel Read, climate and energy campaigner at Greenpeace Japan.

Amidst the criticism, Toyota in December upgraded its annual sales target of fully electric vehicles to 3.5 million units from 2 million BEVs and fuel cell vehicles by 2030, and last week said it will invest up to 730 billion yen ($5.1 billion) in Japan and the United States to make batteries for fully electric vehicles.

"We do recognise that they've made some gains, Read said. "However, fundamentally, when compared to other global automakers, they're falling far behind."

The ranking measured progress in phasing out internal-combustion engines, supply chain decarbonisation and resource reduction and efficiency.

A Toyota spokesperson said in a statement the company is working to slash CO2 emissions as much and quickly as possible, adding that it will continue to "make every effort possible to offer as many options of (battery electric vehicles) and other multi-powertrains to our customers around the world."

Nissan and Honda ranked 8th and 9th, respectively, both dropping three places from last year.

Greenpeace said Honda does not have a roadmap to achieve its own targets, including making zero-emission vehicles and fuel cell vehicles 100% of new sales. The environmental group also said sales of zero-emission vehicles have not grown significantly for Nissan, which was considered a pioneer in the fully electric vehicle market with the Leaf.

A Honda spokesperson said it would continue to work towards carbon neutrality by 2050. A Nissan spokesperson declined to comment on the Greenpeace report but said the company would continue to accelerate its electrification efforts.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: An exhaust emits fumes as a car is driven through Richmond in London, Britain December 2, 2016.  REUTERS/Peter Nicholls/File Photo/File Photo

General Motors Co (NYSE:GM) kept the top position, although scoring only 38.5 out of 100 points.

($1 = 143.8100 yen)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.