💎 Fed’s first rate cut since 2020 set to trigger market. Find undervalued gems with Fair ValueSee Undervalued Stocks

Third time's a charm for UPS at Christmas, but FedEx stumbles

Published 12/29/2015, 02:03 PM
Updated 12/29/2015, 02:10 PM
© Reuters. United Parcel Service air craft are being loaded with air containers full of packages bound for their final destination at the UPS Worldport All Points International Hub during the peak delivery month in Louisville in this file photo
FDX
-
UPS
-

By Nick Carey

CHICAGO (Reuters) - After two consecutive years of problems during its holiday peak package season, UPS delivered on time at Christmas this year while its main rival FedEx had a last-minute stumble that left some gifts undelivered until after the holiday.

"It seems like the third time's a charm for UPS," said Kent Winegar, portfolio manager at Austin, Texas-based Terry McDaniel & Co, which manages assets of around $900 million and holds nearly $15 million in UPS stock. "But if e-commerce keeps growing at such a rapid rate we'll see how they do next year."

A late surge in e-commerce orders and bad weather in 2013 left an estimated 2 million packages undelivered on Christmas Eve, mostly stranded in Atlanta-based United Parcel Service Inc's (N:UPS) package network. Arch rival FedEx Corp (N:FDX) experienced problems on a smaller scale. Last year, UPS spent $500 million, boosted seasonal hiring and worked with retailers to forecast package volumes that failed to materialize and overspending hurt fourth-quarter earnings. FedEx did not experience problems that year.

This year UPS focused on what spokesman Steve Gaut described as a "disciplined approach" to peak season, that included pulling delivery dates forward on days when it had excess capacity in its network and informing retailers of hard cutoff dates for packages to make it by Christmas using UPS' cheaper ground delivery service.

As a result, many retailers informed customers free shipping would end the week before Christmas - as shipping by air would be too expensive.

Noelle Sadler, chief marketing officer at online clothing retailer LuLu's, said the firm stopped free shipping over a week before the holidays because it was "hamstrung by UPS and have to follow their rules." 

UPS network was snarled up for about a week after Black Friday particularly in California, Texas and the Northeast, but focused its resources to catch up, spokesman Gaut said.

In the week running up to Dec. 24, UPS had an on-time delivery rate of between 97 percent and 98 percent, he said. The company's on-time rate on a normal day, when daily package volumes are around half those during peak, is between 98 percent and 99 percent.

FedEx, on the other hand, struggled and said in a statement this was because of a "surge of last-minute e-commerce shipments."

© Reuters. United Parcel Service air craft are being loaded with air containers full of packages bound for their final destination at the UPS Worldport All Points International Hub during the peak delivery month in Louisville in this file photo

The company said late packages were delivered Dec. 26, but did not provide any details on the number of packages that were late or in what parts of the United States.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.