🔺 What to do when markets are at an all-time high? Find smart bargains, like these.See Undervalued Stocks

Clear Channel Outdoor settles China bribery charges -SEC

Published 09/28/2023, 04:16 PM
Updated 09/28/2023, 07:51 PM
© Reuters. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission logo adorns an office door at the SEC headquarters in Washington, June 24, 2011. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File photo
CCO
-

By Kanishka Singh and Chris Prentice

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said on Thursday that advertising company Clear Channel Outdoor (NYSE:CCO) Holdings agreed to pay more than $26 million to resolve charges it bribed Chinese government officials to obtain outdoor ad contracts in violation of U.S. law.

The SEC complaint alleged the company violated the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act through the actions of its agent, Clear Media Limited, which at the time was a Clear Channel majority-owned subsidiary in China.

The SEC said from at least 2012 through 2017, Clear Media bribed Chinese government officials to obtain contracts required to sell advertising services to public and private sector clients for display on public bus shelters and other outdoor displays.

The regulator also said that from at least 2012 through 2019, Clear Channel failed to ensure sufficient internal accounting controls were in place at Clear Media.

"Clear Media bribed Chinese officials with expensive gifts and entertainment and used off-book consultants to obtain contracts from Chinese authorities," Charles Cain, a senior SEC official, said in a statement.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The headquarters of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are seen in Washington, July 6, 2009. REUTERS/Jim Bourg/File Photo

The company confirmed the settlement and said it cooperated with the SEC, adding it has since sold its entire interest in Clear Media while also improving its internal controls.

Without admitting or denying the SEC findings, Clear Channel agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing future violations, pay disgorgement plus prejudgment interest totaling about $20.1 million, and pay a $6 million civil penalty, according to the settlement.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.