📈 Fed's first cut since 2020: Time to buy the dip? See Tech-focused stock picksUnlock AI Picks

Room to hike Kors prices seen in Tapestry-Capri merger, executive testifies

Published 09/10/2024, 05:37 PM
Updated 09/10/2024, 06:25 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A view of a Coach store, a brand owned by Tapestry, Inc., in Manhattan, New York, U.S., November 15, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo
TPR
-
CPRI
-

By Siddharth Cavale

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Fashion holding company Tapestry (NYSE:TPR) has room to raise prices and lower discounts on rival Capri's Michael Kors brand if the companies merged, a top Tapestry executive testified on Tuesday as regulators sought to block the $8.5 billion deal.

Tapestry's brands include Coach , Kate Spade and Stuart Weitzman while Capri also owns Jimmy Choo and Versace.

On the second day of a trial in federal court in the Southern District Court of New York, the Federal Trade Commission presented slides to support its claim that the merger would lead to higher prices by ending competition between the rivals.

The slides included Tapestry's internal consumer research deck sent to CEO Joanne Crevoiserat in 2022 by Elizabeth Harris, senior vice president for global strategy and consumer insights.

"Coach has been priced on average $147 above Michael Kors for the last two years," a title in the slide deck read, suggesting room to increase Michael Kors' average unit retail price.

Harris responded that she saw the opportunity to raise prices because of the gap between what consumers pay for Coach and Michael Kors handbags, including taxes and fees.

However, that did not imply Tapestry would hike prices, she said, noting other factors such as brand creative work, design, and material costs in setting prices. Pricing also depends on how Tapestry executes these actions and the brand's desirability, she added.

Another slide showed Harris suggesting that Tapestry could reduce the levels of discounting on Kors' products.

The two slides omitted the additional cost factors when it was presented to Crevoiserat, Harris admitted. "This was just a quick data pull we had at the time and didn't dictate what could happen."

Harris said the deck resulted from Crevoiserat's directive to research market dynamics and identify suitable merger and acquisition targets, a process that began around mid-2022. She noted that the slides were created by someone on her team and were part of a "touch base" meeting with Crevoiserat in August 2022. She said she never saw the deck again after sending it to Crevoiserat.

Tapestry said it does not comment on pending litigation. It pointed Reuters to its pretrial statement that evidence will show that the proposed merger will benefit consumers.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A view of a Coach store, a brand owned by Tapestry, Inc., in Manhattan, New York, U.S., November 15, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo

The trial, overseen by District Judge Jennifer Rochon, is expected to end on Wednesday next week, with closing statements on Sept. 30.

A ruling could take anywhere between one to three months after that, lawyers for Tapestry said.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.