💎 Fed’s first rate cut since 2020 set to trigger market. Find undervalued gems with Fair ValueSee Undervalued Stocks

No proof of bribery in Eurofighter deal: Austrian parliament report

Published 09/20/2017, 01:03 PM
Updated 09/20/2017, 01:10 PM
© Reuters. The logo of Airbus Group is seen on the company's headquarters building in Toulouse, Southwestern France
AIR
-
BAES
-
LDOF
-

VIENNA (Reuters) - A parliamentary inquiry into Austria's $2 billion Eurofighter deal found no indications of bribery or that Airbus (PA:AIR) and its partners illegally influenced Austrian politicians, according to the final report on the matter.

Lawmakers launched their inquiry in March to check whether politicians might have accepted bribes from the makers of Eurofighter to approve the deal.

Vienna prosecutors are pursuing a separate investigation into allegations of fraud against Airbus and the Eurofighter consortium (l:BAES) based on earlier complaints from the defense ministry, which is seeking up to 1.1 billion euros in compensation.

Airbus and the consortium, which includes Britain's BAE Systems (L:BAES) and Italy's Leonardo (MI:LDOF), rejected the accusations as politically motivated and, on Monday, threatened Austria's defense minister with legal action.

Allegations that decision-makers pocketed money for their approval of the Eurofighter deal surfaced almost immediately after the original purchase was agreed in 2003.

Legislators investigated a settlement Austria reached with Eurofighter in 2007 to reduce the order to 15 jets from 18 as well as the volume of so-called offset deals meant to provide business for the local economy to 3.5 billion euros ($4.2 billion) from 4 billion. MPs said they did not have enough time to clarify the circumstances of the initial order.

Former Defence Minister Norbert Darabos, a Social Democrat who negotiated the settlement with Eurofighter, was one of the politicians strongly criticized for allegedly having allowed Airbus to outwit him.

But the parliamentary report said no indications were found "that there would have been unacceptable influence on Darabos and his entourage in the context of the settlement negotiations".

Airbus declined comment on the report.

It was not immediately clear if the report would have any impact on the separate criminal investigation.

"A parliamentary inquiry is no substitute for the prosecutor and not a criminal court, but it can deliver valuable hints for the prosecutor's investigation," said Karlheinz Kopf, who chaired the lawmakers' inquiry.

While dismissing bribery allegations, the report also repeated a Defence Ministry complaint that the Alpine republic appeared to have been "deceived" regarding its partners' ability to deliver certain jets as initially agreed.

It also highlighted findings from a decade ago that Airbus had provided millions of euros in sponsorship money in connection with the Eurofighter deal to a soccer club that is seen as close to Austria's Social Democrats.

The parliamentary report further assessed that Darabos did not liaise sufficiently with other ministries and agencies while negotiating the settlement and was not transparent enough to allow a court audit of the deal.

The legislators wound up their investigation earlier than planned because Austria called snap elections for Oct. 15, a year ahead of schedule. Airbus has clashed with other European governments, notably Germany, before, but the row with Austria is unique in its fury.

© Reuters. The logo of Airbus Group is seen on the company's headquarters building in Toulouse, Southwestern France

The defense ministry said this week said it was open to an out-of-court settlement with Airbus and the consortium. But if no agreement were possible, it would also consider filing a lawsuit based on U.S. rules.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.