💎 Fed’s first rate cut since 2020 set to trigger market. Find undervalued gems with Fair ValueSee Undervalued Stocks

Nebraska court clears pipeline route as showdown looms in Washington

Published 01/09/2015, 12:55 PM
© Reuters. A depot used to store pipes for Transcanada Corp's planned Keystone XL oil pipeline is seen in Gascoyne North Dakota

By Aruna Viswanatha and Patrick Rucker

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Nebraska Supreme Court on Friday removed one of the last hurdles for President Barack Obama to settle the fate of the politically charged Keystone XL oil pipeline, delivering a closely watched decision on an issue that could help define his second term.

After months of deliberation, the court allowed a route for the pipeline to cross the state, shifting the debate over TransCanada Corp's controversial line fully to Washington, where Republicans now in control of Congress are seeking to force its final approval after more than six years of acrimony with the White House.

A White House officials said on Friday that Obama would reject legislation that tries to push the project ahead.

"If presented to the president, he will veto," spokesman Eric Schultz said in a statement.

The Nebraska ruling came hours before the U.S. House of Representatives planned to vote on legislation approving the pipeline, which would help carry up to 830,000 barrels of oil per day from Canada's oil sands to Gulf Coast refineries.

The Senate is expected to take up a Keystone bill for debate next week.

In Nebraska, the legal question narrowly focused on whether the governor had a right to bless a pipeline route, but the state supreme court has had the matter since February and the 64-page ruling reflects how contentious it has become.

The court said it could not decide whether legislation backed by former governor Dave Heineman wrongly gave him authority to grant TransCanada a pipeline route in 2012. But the court was deadlocked, which amounted to ruling in the company's favor.

"(B)ecause there are not five judges of this court voting on the constitutionality of (the legislation), the legislation must stand by default," the seven-judge panel said in its ruling.

The pipeline debate has energized environmentalists who see it as an emblem of fossil fuel dependence and energy interests who see a Canada-to-Texas pipeline system as a tool to spur energy production in North America.

The president has said he could not endorse a project that meaningfully worsens climate change and the issue could become one of the more controversial of his second term.

But Congress may yet settle the matter if Republicans can surmount an Obama veto or attach a Keystone provision to must-pass legislation.

"It's time to start building," Speaker of the House John Boehner said in a statement.

STATE DEPARTMENT

The court's ruling allows the U.S. State Department to decide whether the pipeline meant to carry Canadian oil sands fuel would be in the national interest, a necessary step for the cross-border energy project.

Environmentalists oppose Keystone since it could help expand oil sands development.

Officials had said they could not test whether the project is in the national interest before the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled. Friday's decision cleared the way.

Three judges said they believed the landowners who initially challenged the legislation did not do so properly, and declined to offer an opinion on whether it was constitutional.

The other four judges said they believed the law, which allowed the governor to bypass regulatory procedures and approve the route himself, was unconstitutional. But the court said it required five judges to agree in order to rule on whether a legislative enactment was constitutional, and left the law in place by default.

Anti-Keystone activists in Nebraska said on Friday they pinned their hopes on the White House to reject the project.

"While the outcome may not be what we had hoped for, I believe we have successfully sent the message that Nebraska citizens are willing to stand up," said Randy Thompson, a landowner plaintiff who said he expected Obama would reject Keystone.

© Reuters. A depot used to store pipes for Transcanada Corp's planned Keystone XL oil pipeline is seen in Gascoyne North Dakota

(This version of the story fixes a typo in paragraph 12.)

(Timothy Gardner, Jeff Mason and Amanda Becker in Washington contributed; Editing by Alden Bentley) 2015-01-09T174338Z_2_LYNXMPEB080LY_RTROPTP_1_USA-CONGRESS-KEYSTONE.JPG urn:newsml:onlinereport.com:20150109:nRTROPT20150109143736LYNXMPEB080LY A depot used to store pipes for Transcanada Corp's planned Keystone XL oil pipeline is seen in Gascoyne North Dakota OLUSPOLITIC Reuters US Online Report Politics News 20150109T143736+0000 20150109T143736+0000

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.