💎 Fed’s first rate cut since 2020 set to trigger market. Find undervalued gems with Fair ValueSee Undervalued Stocks

Major book publishers defeat Internet Archive appeal over digital scanning

Published 09/04/2024, 02:18 PM
Updated 09/04/2024, 02:37 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A customer reads a book in New York, July 14, 2015. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson/File photo

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court sided with four major book publishers that accused the nonprofit Internet Archive of illegally scanning copyrighted works and lending them to the public online for free and without permission.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan agreed with Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, John Wiley & Sons and Penguin Random House that the archive's "large scale" copying and distribution of entire books did not amount to "fair use."

Publishers accused the nonprofit of infringing copyrights in 127 books from authors like Malcolm Gladwell, C.S. Lewis, Toni Morrison, J.D. Salinger and Elie Wiesel, by making the books freely available through its Free Digital Library.

The archive, which hosts more than 3.2 million copies of copyrighted books on its website, contended that the library was transformative because it made lending more convenient and served the public interest by promoting "access to knowledge."

But in a 59-page decision on Wednesday, Circuit Judge Beth Robinson said the archive merely supplanted the original books rather than transform them into "something new."

She said making books available for free harmed publishers and would "undoubtedly negatively impact the public," by taking away the incentive for many consumers and libraries to pay for books and for many authors to produce new works.

Robinson quoted a declaration from Sandra Cisneros, who wrote the best-selling novel "The House on Mango Street," that finding her works available for free online "was like I had gone to a pawn shop and seen my stolen possessions on sale."

The Internet Archive was appealing a March 2023 ruling from U.S. District Judge John Koeltl in Manhattan.

"We are reviewing the court's opinion and will continue to defend the rights of libraries to own, lend and preserve books," said Chris Freeland, the archive's director of library services.

Maria Pallante, president of the Association of American Publishers, said the decision "reinforced the indispensable role of authors and publishers in society" and was a major victory for authors, publishers and readers.

The Internet Archive limits lending from its Free Digital Library to one "checkout" for each physical book in storage.

It temporarily expanded lending in 2020, allowing checkouts by up to 10,000 users at a time, when the COVID-19 pandemic caused mass closures of schools, libraries and bookstores.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A customer reads a book in New York, July 14, 2015. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson/File photo

The expansion ended on June 16, 2020, two weeks after the publishers sued.

The case is Hachette Book Group Inc et al v. Internet Archive, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-1260.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.