NVDA Q3 Earnings Alert: Why our AI stock picker is still holding Nvidia stockRead More

Judge reduces UPS driver's $237.6 million bias verdict to $39.6 million

Published 11/18/2024, 03:14 PM
Updated 11/18/2024, 03:15 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Mercedes electric UPS delivery truck is seen in London's Mayfair shopping district, Britain, March 27, 2024. REUTERS/Lisa Baertlein/File Photo
UPS
-

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - A federal judge reduced a $237.6 million jury award against United Parcel Service to $39.6 million in the case of a Black former driver who accused the package delivery company of workplace bias and wrongful firing.

In a decision made public on Friday, U.S. District Judge Thomas Rice in Yakima, Washington, accepted UPS' request to throw out a $198 million in punitive damages award, finding jurors acted unreasonably in awarding the sum to Tahvio Gratton.

The decision does not affect the jury's $39.6 million award to Gratton for emotional distress, but UPS plans to ask that it be thrown out as well.

Rice found no proof that a UPS supervisor intended to commandeer a probe into whether Gratton touched a female worker inappropriately on a loading dock, resulting in Gratton's October 2021 dismissal after five years of employment.

He also said Gratton was able to tell his side of the story, with assistance from his union.

Gratton said UPS used the loading dock incident, for which he said he apologized immediately, as a pretext for firing him over his complaints about the workplace.

In his lawsuit, Gratton said supervisors at a UPS facility in Yakima frequently passed him over for route assignments in favor of less senior drivers and gave him less desirable trucks and routes than white drivers received.

Gratton also said a younger white supervisor repeatedly called him "boy" and defended using that term by saying: "I'm from the South. That's how I talk."

UPS said on Monday it plans to seek a new trial and overturn the remainder of the Sept. 12 verdict.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Mercedes electric UPS delivery truck is seen in London's Mayfair shopping district, Britain, March 27, 2024. REUTERS/Lisa Baertlein/File Photo

Lawyers for Gratton did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The case is Gratton v United Parcel Service Inc (NYSE:UPS), U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Washington, No. 22-03149.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.