📈 Fed's first cut since 2020: Time to buy the dip? See Tech-focused stock picksUnlock AI Picks

JPMorgan defeats London Whale shareholder lawsuit in U.S.

Published 12/03/2015, 04:33 PM
© Reuters. People walk inside JP Morgan headquarters in New York
JPM
-

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal appeals court said JPMorgan Chase & Co (N:JPM) Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon and other bank officials need not face a shareholder lawsuit claiming they did a bad job investigating the 2012 "London Whale" trading scandal that caused $6.2 billion of losses.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday said the plaintiff Ernesto Espinoza did not show that JPMorgan's board was grossly negligent or engaged in bad faith in probing the losses and whether bank officials publicly downplayed them, and in deciding not to sue the people involved.

JPMorgan suffered losses in its chief investment office because of derivative bets by Bruno Iksil, known as the London Whale because of the size of his wagers.

Dimon received criticism soon after the scandal broke for calling media reports about the losses a "tempest in a teapot."

Writing for the New York-based appeals court, Chief Judge Robert Katzmann said JPMorgan conducted an "exhaustive" London Whale probe that led to many changes sought by Espinoza including pay cuts, clawbacks and improved controls.

Citing applicable Delaware law, Katzmann also called courts "ill-suited" to second-guess board decisions, and said New York-based JPMorgan was not required to explain to Espinoza point-by-point why it did not do more.

"Espinoza has not sufficiently rebutted the presumption that JPMorgan's board acted in good faith in responding to his demand letter," Katzmann wrote for a three-judge panel.

George Aguilar, a partner at Robbins Arroyo representing Espinoza, said: "We're naturally disappointed by the court's opinion, but respectful of its view." No decision has been made on whether to appeal.

The appeals court had in June upheld the March 2014 dismissal of Espinoza's lawsuit by U.S. District Judge George Daniels.

It revisited the case after asking the Delaware Supreme Court to advise how to evaluate shareholder challenges to the scope of board investigations.

© Reuters. People walk inside JP Morgan headquarters in New York

JPMorgan paid more than $1 billion and admitted wrongdoing to settle U.S. and British probes into the London Whale matter.

Former JPMorgan traders Javier Martin-Artajo and Julien Grout have been charged with hiding losses linked to Iksil, a French national. Iksil is cooperating with prosecutors.

The case is Espinoza v Dimon et al, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 14-1754.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.