💎 Fed’s first rate cut since 2020 set to trigger market. Find undervalued gems with Fair ValueSee Undervalued Stocks

GM ignition-switch plaintiffs ask to revise early trial plan

Published 02/19/2016, 11:35 AM
Updated 02/19/2016, 11:40 AM
© Reuters. The GM logo is seen at the General Motors Lansing Grand River Assembly Plant in Lansing,
GM
-

By Jessica Dye

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Lawyers for plaintiffs suing General Motors (N:GM) over a faulty ignition switch are seeking alternatives to a plan to try five more early test cases in federal litigation against GM over the issue, after a first trial fell apart unexpectedly.

In a letter sent Thursday to U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan, who oversees the cases, the lawyers said trying the remaining cases set for this year may not be the most efficient way to advance the resolution of hundreds of remaining injury and death claims. The faulty switch is linked to nearly 400 injuries and deaths.

“GM needs no assistance from a jury’s verdict to determine settlement value given its years-long disbursement of hundreds of millions of dollars of settlement monies to thousands of victims,” the lawyers wrote.

In a statement, GM spokesman Jim Cain said the company believed the current plan “remains the best process to inform settlement value for the remaining cases.”

GM has admitted that certain employees had known for years, prior to its 2014 recall of 2.6 million vehicles, that problems with the switch could cause it to slip out of place, stalling engines and cutting power to air bags, brakes and steering. It has paid $2 billion in related penalties and settlements.

In consolidated litigation over common issues, it is typical to try a series of test, or bellwether, cases to help assess how jurors value the claims. Furman had set six bellwethers for federal injury and death cases.

The first was dismissed mid-trial in January following allegations that the plaintiff lied on the stand.

That prompted one lawyer, Lance Cooper, to call for the removal of Robert Hilliard, who is leading federal injury and death cases. Furman rejected his request.

Given the highly individual nature of the cases, Hilliard and his co-lead counsel said they questioned the utility of trying all five bellwethers set for this year. While bellwethers are meant to help inform settlement talks, they said, much can be gleaned from GM’s earlier payouts.

Plaintiffs were exploring all options, given recent developments, Hilliard added in an email.

“Should we have obtained a billion-dollar verdict in the first trial, we would still be working on ways to resolve the entire docket, quickly and efficiently,” he said.

The next federal trial is set to start in March. Roughly 20 other trials are scheduled this year in state courts.

© Reuters. The GM logo is seen at the General Motors Lansing Grand River Assembly Plant in Lansing,

The case is In re General Motors Ignition Switch Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 14-2543.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.