🔴 LIVE: The Secrets of ProPicks AI Success Revealed + November’s List FREEWatch Now

GM cleared in first case over updated ignition switch

Published 07/19/2017, 02:39 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A recalled Chevy Cobalt ignition switch is seen at Raymond Chevrolet in Antioch
GM
-

By Tina Bellon

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal jury in New York on Wednesday found General Motors (N:GM) was not to blame for a crash of an Arizona man who alleged that his accident was caused by an updated version of the carmaker's ignition switch that did not adequately fix the flaws of a previous model.

An earlier version of the switch had been linked to nearly 400 injuries and deaths, but GM settled the last case involving that switch in September last year. The company so far has paid roughly $2.5 billion in criminal and civil penalties, settlements and legal fees in connection with that switch.

The plaintiff, Dennis Ward, said in this lawsuit that an updated model of that defective switch was to blame for the 2014 accident in which he hurt his knee. He alleged the switch suddenly rotated out of place, cutting off his car's power and leaving him unable to steer and brake the vehicle.

There are some 230 individual cases pending with the Manhattan court over the new switch model, six of which have been selected as test trials.

"In this case, the jury carefully considered the evidence and found that the ignition switch in this car was not defective and played no role in the accident," GM said in a statement after the verdict.

Ward's car had been outfitted with the so-called "190 switch," an updated version of the previous "423 switch" model.

GM conceded the 423 switch was defective, leading to the 2014 recall of 2.6 million vehicles. But the company insisted that the flaws were solved in the updated model, which was equipped with a stronger spring to improve resistance.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A recalled Chevy Cobalt ignition switch is seen at Raymond Chevrolet in Antioch

During the trial, the carmaker's defense lawyers had said the accident was Ward's own fault for not paying attention to traffic conditions and the road ahead.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.