🔴 LIVE: The Secrets of ProPicks AI Success Revealed + November’s List FREEWatch Now

First Republic ex-employees' lawsuit against US FDIC is dismissed

Published 07/12/2024, 05:04 PM
Updated 07/12/2024, 05:20 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A branch of First Republic Bank is seen after Jamie Dimon's JPMorgan Chase & Co emerged as the winner of a weekend auction of the bank in San Franciso, California, U.S. May 1, 2023. REUTERS/Hyun Joo Jin/File Photo
FRCB
-

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - A federal judge in California dismissed a lawsuit accusing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) of improperly blocking nearly 170 former employees of the failed First Republic Bank (OTC:FRCB) from accessing at least $150 million of retirement funds.

U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam ruled on Friday that a federal law enacted after the 1980s savings and loan crisis gave the FDIC broad authority to act as receiver for failed banks, and prevented him from getting involved.

Lawyers for the former employees did not immediately respond to requests for comment. An FDIC spokesman declined to comment.

First Republic failed on May 1, 2023, after a series of Federal Reserve interest rate increases caused large losses in its investment portfolio and led many depositors to move their money elsewhere.

The San Francisco-based bank had catered to wealthy customers. Its $229 billion of assets made the collapse the largest U.S. bank failure since the 2008 financial crisis.

JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM) acquired First Republic's deposits and nearly all its assets.

In their complaint filed last December, the former First Republic employees alleged that the FDIC had on May 18, 2023, wrongfully stopped making payments under their deferred compensation plan.

They said this made them unsecured creditors who would likely recover "little, if anything" even as depositors were protected, and sought to recover what they said they were owed.

But the Oakland, California-based judge said granting that request would interfere with the FDIC's statutory powers. Gilliam dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, meaning it cannot be brought again. The judge said the law "forecloses actions - like this one - which seek to 'restrain or affect' the FDIC in fulfilling its receivership duties."

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A branch of First Republic Bank is seen after Jamie Dimon's JPMorgan Chase & Co emerged as the winner of a weekend auction of the bank in San Franciso, California, U.S. May 1, 2023. REUTERS/Hyun Joo Jin/File Photo

JPMorgan was not a party to the case. First Republic failed less than two months after the failures of two other lenders, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank (OTC:SBNY).

The case is Harrington et al v FDIC, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 23-06296.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.