FDIC sues 17 former Silicon Valley Bank executives, directors over collapse

Published 01/16/2025, 06:54 PM
Updated 01/16/2025, 07:32 PM
© Reuters. FDIC representatives speak with customers outside of the Silicon Valley Bank headquarters in Santa Clara, California, U.S. March 13, 2023. REUTERS/Brittany Hosea-Small/File Photo
SBNY
-
SIVBQ
-
FRCB
-

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - The FDIC on Thursday sued 17 former executives and directors of Silicon Valley Bank, seeking to recover billions of dollars for alleged gross negligence and breaches of fiduciary duty that caused the bank's March 2023 collapse, one of the largest U.S. banking failures.

In a complaint filed in San Francisco federal court, the FDIC, in its capacity the bank's receiver, said the defendants ignored fundamental standards of prudent banking and the bank's own risk policies in letting the bank take on excessive risks to boost short-term profit and its stock price.

The FDIC faulted the bank's overreliance on unhedged, interest rate-sensitive long-term government bonds such as U.S. Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities, as rates looked set to - and eventually did - rise.

It also objected to the payment of a "grossly imprudent" $294 million dividend to its parent that drained needed capital "at a time of financial distress and management weakness" in Dec. 2022, less than three months before its demise.

"SVB represents a case of egregious mismanagement of interest-rate and liquidity risks by the bank's former officers and directors," the complaint said.

The defendants include former Chief Executive Gregory Becker, former Chief Financial Officer Daniel Beck, four other former executives, and 11 former directors.

Becker's lawyer was traveling on Thursday and unable to comment, a spokesperson said.

Lawyers for former Chief Risk Officer Laura Izurieta called it "outrageous" to make her a defendant, saying she provided sound risk management advice before stepping down in April 2022, well before the bank's collapse.

"Their actions are reflective of outgoing FDIC leadership that is not interested in the truth," Izurieta's lawyers said.

Lawyers for the other defendants did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Silicon Valley Bank's March 10, 2023 collapse and seizure by the FDIC shocked financial markets.

It disrupted many technology startups whose deposits it held, and upset many customers because an unusually large percentage of its deposits was uninsured.

The collapse presaged the demise of two other banks, Signature Bank (OTC:SBNY) and First Republic Bank (OTC:FRCB), and prompted fears of a replay of the 2008 banking crisis.

First Citizens BancShares, a North Carolina lender, acquired Silicon Valley Bank's deposits and tens of billions of dollars of loans in an FDIC-arranged sale.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: SVB (Silicon Valley Bank) logo and decreasing stock graph are seen in this illustration taken March 19, 2023. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

Silicon Valley Bank had about $209 billion of assets when it failed. Larger U.S. bank failures include Lehman Brothers in 2008, Washington Mutual including its banking unit in 2008, and First Republic in 2023.

The case is FDIC as receiver v Becker et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 25-00569.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.