Cyber Monday Deal: Up to 60% off InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Explainer-The FDIC's 'special' fee to make banks pay for SVB cleanup

Published 04/12/2023, 06:06 AM
Updated 04/12/2023, 06:28 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) logo is seen at the FDIC headquarters in Washington, February 23, 2011. REUTERS/Jason Reed/File Photo/File Photo
JPM
-
WFC
-
SBNY
-

By Douglas Gillison and Hannah Lang

(Reuters) - The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp is expected to propose next month how to make the U.S. banking sector pay for an estimated $23 billion hole in its insurance fund by the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank (OTC:SBNY) in March.

The agency has broad authority in setting the terms of what is known as a "special assessment" to fill the gap and precisely what this will look like is still an open question.

Banking trade organizations tell Reuters they have yet to hear specifics about the assessment. The FDIC declined to comment.

Here is what is known about the assessment and the insurance fund:

What is the Deposit Insurance Fund?

The Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) is a pot of cash that the FDIC maintains to guarantee up to $250,000 of depositors' money. As an insurance premium, banks ordinarily pay a quarterly "assessment" based on a set methodology drawing on financial data and risk determinations.

To stop the spread of panicked withdrawals throughout the banking system last month, the FDIC guaranteed all deposits at SVB and Signature Bank, even those over $250,000. Such losses require the FDIC to impose a "special assessment" to replenish the DIF.

The law does not define the "assessment base" for the special assessment or which banks will pay it. There is not a time frame for recouping the funds. Echoing the testimony of FDIC Chair Martin Gruenberg, former FDIC Chair Sheila Bair told Reuters on April 6 the agency has "a lot of latitude" in designing the special assessment.

What happened the last time?

Currently, the law requires the FDIC to maintain $1.35 in the fund for every $100 of insured deposits. By the end of December, DIF's balance stood at $128.2 billion, meaning the bank failures in March could account for about 18% of the fund.

During the financial crisis of 2008 the sheer volume of bank failures pushed the DIF about $20 billion into the red. After a period of public comment, the FDIC's May 2009 final rule on a special assessment put the cost burden more heavily on the shoulders of the biggest financial institutions.

In the second quarter of 2009, for example, JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:JPM) booked a $675 million pre-tax charge for the special assessment, which it said shaved 10 cents off earnings per share. Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) reported an 8 cent per-share hit to earnings.

Who will pay the special assessment?

When the FDIC initially called for a special assessment amounting to 20 basis points of banks' insured deposits in the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2008, small-town bankers pushed back hard, letters written at the time show.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) logo is seen at the FDIC headquarters in Washington, February 23, 2011. REUTERS/Jason Reed/File Photo/File Photo

Top officials in Washington have signaled that regulators likely won't make the smaller banks pay for last month's failures this time round either. This reflects a change Congress and the FDIC made after the 2008 meltdown to make larger, riskier banks contribute proportionately more to maintaining the DIF.

An industry representative who asked not to be named told Reuters that bankers were hoping the ultimate bill would be less than $23 billion after the FDIC completes sales of SVB and Signature Bank assets.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.