Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG), a global insurance brokerage, risk management, and consulting services firm, reported a strong first quarter in 2024, with significant growth across its segments. The company's Brokerage and Risk Management segments both saw substantial revenue increases, with organic growth exceeding expectations. The Brokerage segment experienced a 21% revenue increase, while the Risk Management segment, Gallagher Bassett, grew by 19%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. completed a series of mergers, contributing nearly $70 million in estimated annualized revenue, and anticipates continued strong performance and merger and acquisition opportunities.
Key Takeaways
- Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported 20% revenue growth in its Brokerage and Risk Management segments.
- The company completed 12 mergers, adding roughly $70 million in estimated annualized revenue.
- Brokerage segment saw a revenue increase of 21% and organic growth of 8.9%.
- Risk Management segment, Gallagher Bassett, reported a revenue increase of 19% and organic growth of 13.3%.
- Full-year organic growth is expected to be 7-9% for Brokerage and 9-11% for Risk Management.
- The company has a robust pipeline for future mergers and acquisitions, with a culture focused on integrity, ethics, and trust.
- CEO J. Patrick Gallagher underscored the company's resilience against potential impacts from FTC's plan to remove non-compete agreements.
Company Outlook
- Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. maintains a positive outlook with expectations of strong organic growth and M&A opportunities.
- The company forecasts organic growth in the 7-9% range for its Brokerage segment and 9-11% for its Risk Management segment for the full year.
- Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has about $1 billion in cash and anticipates a total M&A capacity of $3.5 billion in 2024, with the potential to fund over $4 billion in 2025 while maintaining an investment-grade rating.
Bearish Highlights
- Concerns were raised about the potential impact of the FTC's plan to remove non-compete agreements, though the company believes it will not significantly affect their strategy.
- The company noted that the property insurance market is facing uncertainty due to the unpredictable hurricane season.
Bullish Highlights
- The company reported stable pricing and increased demand in the reinsurance market, particularly for property cat cover.
- There is optimism for reacceleration in RPC (NYSE:RES) (revenue per client) due to higher exposure in the property business and potential casualty pricing increases.
- Investments in people, technology, cybersecurity, data analytics, and AI are expected to enhance service offerings and drive growth.
Misses
- While there were large life sales in March, they did not significantly impact overall revenue.
- The workers' compensation line has remained flat, with no significant changes in frequencies, severity, or pricing.
Q&A Highlights
- CEO J. Patrick Gallagher expressed confidence in the company's integration process and potential for acquiring family-owned brokers.
- The company is investing $200-300 million annually in technology and innovation to improve client services.
- Group benefits clients are concerned about turnover and attracting talent, with rising costs being a significant challenge.
- Umbrella insurance constitutes approximately 6% of the company's business.
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. continues to demonstrate strong financial performance and strategic growth initiatives. The company's focus on organic growth, coupled with its merger and acquisition strategy, positions it well for sustained success in the global insurance market. With a robust pipeline for future deals and a commitment to investing in technology and human capital, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is poised to navigate the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.
InvestingPro Insights
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has consistently demonstrated a commitment to shareholder returns, as reflected by an impressive track record of raising its dividend for 13 consecutive years. This, coupled with a forecast of net income growth this year, underscores the company's financial robustness. For investors looking for stability, an InvestingPro Tip highlights that AJG stock generally trades with low price volatility, which could be a reassuring sign amidst market fluctuations.
From a valuation standpoint, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is trading at a high earnings multiple, with a current P/E ratio of 47.88, which adjusts to 28.41 when looking at the last twelve months as of Q1 2024. This suggests that investors are willing to pay a premium for the company's earnings, possibly due to its strong historical performance and positive growth outlook. Furthermore, the company's Price / Book ratio as of Q1 2024 stands at 4.51, indicating that the market values the company's assets highly relative to their accounting value.
In terms of recent performance, AJG has seen an 18.66% revenue growth over the last twelve months as of Q1 2024, which aligns with the robust financial results reported in the article. This growth trajectory is further supported by the fact that analysts predict the company will remain profitable this year, as per another InvestingPro Tip.
For readers interested in deeper analysis and additional insights, there are more InvestingPro Tips available for AJG at https://www.investing.com/pro/AJG. These tips provide valuable perspectives for both current and potential investors. To enhance your InvestingPro experience, use coupon code PRONEWS24 to get an additional 10% off a yearly or biyearly Pro and Pro+ subscription. With this offer, you can access a total of 11 InvestingPro Tips that can further inform your investment decisions.
Full transcript - Arthur J. Gallagher & Co (AJG) Q1 2024:
Operator: Good afternoon, and welcome to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co’s First Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Today’s call is being recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect at this time. Some of the comments made during this conference call, including answers given in response to questions, may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the securities laws. The company does not assume any obligation to update information or forward-looking statements provided on this call. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. Please refer to the information concerning forward-looking statements and risk factors sections contained in the company’s most recent 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filings for more details on such risks and uncertainties. In addition, for reconciliations of the non-GAAP measures discussed on this call as well as other information regarding these measures, please refer to the earnings release and other materials in the Investor Relations section of the company’s website. It is now my pleasure to introduce J. Patrick Gallagher, Jr., Chairman and CEO of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. Mr. Gallagher, you may begin.
J. Patrick Gallagher: Thank you. Good afternoon. Thank you for joining us for our first quarter ‘24 earnings call. On the call with me today is Doug Howell, our CFO and other members of the management team and the heads of our operating divisions. We had a great first quarter to begin 2024. For our combined Brokerage and Risk Management segments, we posted 20% growth in revenue, our 13th straight quarter of double-digit growth, 9.4% organic; merger and acquisition rollover revenues of approximately $250 million. We also completed 12 mergers totaling nearly $70 million of estimated annualized revenue, reported net earnings margin of 21.5%, adjusted EBITDAC margin of 37.8%, GAAP earnings per share of $3.10 and adjusted earnings per share of $3.83, up 17% year-over-year. So another terrific quarter by the team. Moving to results on a segment basis, starting with the Brokerage segment. Reported revenue growth of 21%. Organic growth was 8.9% and about 10% if you include interest income. Adjusted EBITDAC was up 18% year-over-year. And we posted adjusted EBITDAC margin of 39.9% a bit better than our March IR Day expectations. Let me give some insights behind our Brokerage segment organic, and just to level set, the following figures do not include interest income. Our global retail brokerage operations posted 7% organic. Within our P/C operations, we delivered 7% in the United States, 6% in the U.K., 2% in Canada, and 8% in Australia and New Zealand. And our global employee benefit brokerage and consulting business posted organic of about 8%, including some large live case sales that were completed in late March. Shifting to our reinsurance wholesale and specialty businesses, overall organic of 13%. This includes Gallagher Re at 13%, UK specialty at 10% and U.S. wholesale at 13%. Fantastic growth, whether retail, wholesale or reinsurance. Next, let me provide some thoughts on the PC insurance pricing environment, starting with the primary insurance market. Global first quarter renewal premiums, which include both rate and exposure changes, were up about 7%. Renewal premium increases continue to be broad-based, up across all of our major geographies and most product lines. For example, property was up nearly 10%; umbrella, up 9%; general liability, up 7%; workers’ comp, up 2%; package, up 8%; and personal lines, up 13% So many lines are seeing sizable increases. There are two exceptions within professional lines. First, D&O, where renewal premiums are down about 5%; and second, cyber, where renewal premiums are flattish. These two lines appear close to reaching a pricing bottom, but combined, represent around 5% of our P/C business globally. So overall, our clients continue to see insurance costs increase, but our job as brokers is to mitigate these increases and deliver comprehensive insurance programs that align with their risk appetite and fit their budget. Moving to the reinsurance market. First quarter dynamics were dominated by the January 1 renewal season where we saw stable pricing and increased demand for property cat cover. Reinsurers continue to exercise discipline and met the increased client demand with sufficient capacity. Importantly, the team was able to secure many new business wins while retaining most of our existing clients. During April renewals, reinsurance carriers maintain their discipline, and with increased demand and stable pricing, we saw more coverage being purchased. Within property, more capacity was available at the top end of programs and the quoting of renewal process was disciplined and predictable. The casualty treaty market saw stable pricing overall. However, carriers able to differentiate themselves through good management of prior year reserves were able to secure better reinsurance placements. Specialty class renewals were a bit more complex with some changes in terms and conditions. However, many clients were able to secure modestly lower pricing. With that said, the tragedy in Baltimore may cause reinsurance carriers more pricing resolve throughout the rest of the year. Those interested in more detailed commentary on January or April renewals can find our first new market reports on our website. In our view, insurance and reinsurance carriers continue to behave rationally. Carriers know where they need rate by line, by industry and by geography. We are seeing this differentiation in our data. Premiums are increasing the most, where it’s needed to generate an acceptable underwriting profit. Great example of this is primary casualty, where we are seeing renewal premiums moving higher. Global first quarter umbrella and general liability renewal premium increases are in the high single digits, including 9% increases in U.S. retail. A. M. Best recently maintained its negative outlook on the U.S. general liability insurance market due to worsening social inflation, medical expenses, and litigation financing. We’ve been highlighting these dynamics for a while, along with hearing concerns around historical reserves, which leads us to believe further rate increases are to come in casualty. At the other end of the spectrum, we have property. As insurance and reinsurance carriers believe they are getting closer to price and exposure adequacy, we are seeing property renewal premium increases moderating. With that said, first quarter insurance renewal premiums were still pushing double digits. As we look out for the remainder of the year, increased frequency or severity of catastrophes could again move the market in ‘24. And while capacity was very challenging to come by during ‘22 and ‘23, we are now finding, when clients are looking to add coverage or limits, carriers are more than willing to provide additional cover. Notably, we are not seeing a change in the underwriting standards from our carrier partners. While continued premium increases seem rational to our carrier partners, our clients have experienced multiple years of increased costs, having a trusted adviser like Gallagher to help businesses navigating a complex insurance market by finding the best coverage for our clients while mitigating price increases. That’s what we do. Moving to our customers’ business activity. Overall, it continues to be solid. During the first quarter, our daily indication showed positive mid-year policy endorsements and audits ahead of last year’s levels across most geographies. So, we are not seeing signs of a broad global economic slowdown. Within the U.S., the labor market remains tight. Non-farm payrolls continue to increase and more people are reentering the workforce. Yet there continues to be nearly 9 million job openings. Wage increases have persisted at the same time, medical cost trends are rising. With these dynamics, employers are focused on total rewards strategy to help them achieve their human capital goals while reining in costs. That’s why I believe our benefits businesses will have terrific opportunities in ‘24. Overall, we continue to win new brokerage clients while retaining our existing customers. In fact, our new business production has been on an upward trend in recent quarters, and our retention is holding. We believe this is a direct reflection of our client value proposition, CORE360 and Gallagher Better Works, our niche expert service and our data and analytics. Don’t forget, we are competing with someone smaller than us, 90% of the time. These local brokers just can’t match the value we provide. So putting it all together, we continue to see full-year ‘24 brokerage organic in the 7% to 9% range, and that would be another outstanding year. Moving on to our Risk Management segment, Gallagher Bassett. Revenue growth was 19%, including organic of 13.3% and rollover revenues of $14 million. Adjusted EBITDAC margins were 20.6%, up 140 basis points versus last year and a bit better than our March IR Day expectations. Our results continue to reflect solid new business, outstanding retention, continued increases in new arising claims across both workers’ comp and liability and resilient customer business activity. Looking forward, we continue to see ‘24 full year organic in the 9% to 11% range as our larger ‘23 new business wins have been fully onboarded. We now expect full year margin of approximately 20.5%. That would also be another outstanding year. Shifting to mergers and acquisitions. We had an active first quarter completing 12 new mergers, representing about $70 million of estimated annualized revenue. I’d like to thank all of our new partners for joining us and extend a very warm welcome to our growing Gallagher family of professionals. Looking ahead, our pipeline remains strong. We have around 50 term sheets signed or being prepared, representing around $350 million of annualized revenue. Good firms always have a choice, and we’ll be very excited if they choose to join Gallagher. Let me conclude with some comments regarding our bedrock culture. It’s a culture that has remained constant through the decades of incredible growth. This is largely due to the 25 tenants of The Gallagher Way, which is entering its fifth decade next month. It is deeply rooted in the values of integrity, ethics and trust, which have been guiding us since 1927. Our culture is not just a differentiator, it’s a competitive advantage. It attracts the right talent to our organization and the best merger partners and enables us to build enduring relationships. What makes me particularly proud is that I witness our culture in action every day as our employees demonstrate their commitment to our clients, and that is The Gallagher Way. Okay. I’ll stop now and turn it over to Doug. Doug?
Doug Howell: Thanks, Pat, and hello, everyone. Today, I’ll walk you through our earnings release. I’ll comment on first quarter organic growth and margins by segment, including how we are seeing full year organic growth and margins in each of the next 3 quarters. Then I’ll provide some typical comments on the modeling helpers we provide in the CFO commentary document that we posted on our website, and I’ll conclude my prepared remarks with a few comments on cash, M&A and capital management. Okay. Let’s look to Page 2 of the earnings release. Headline, first quarter brokerage organic growth of 8.9%. That’s a bit better than our March IR Day expectation of 8% to 8.5%. And remember, we exclude interest income. Including such, we would have shown about 10% organic growth. Looking ahead, we continue to see strong new business production and favorable client retention. Combine that with further rate increases, a resilient economic backdrop and sticky inflation, our 2024 brokerage organic outlook is unchanged. We are still seeing full year organic growth in that 7% to 9% range. Moving to Page 4 of the earnings release, to the Brokerage segment adjusted EBITDAC table. First quarter adjusted EBITDAC margin was 39.9%, a bit better than our March IR Day expectations. The footnote on that page explains what we discussed in our January earnings call and again at our March IR Day. There is 90 basis points of roll-in impact from M&A, principally Buck, that naturally runs lower margins. So on the surface, it is showing 30 basis points lower, but underlying margins actually expanded 60 basis points. Again, that improvement is a little better than what we forecasted in March. Let me walk you through a bridge from last year. First, if you were to pull out last year’s 2023 first quarter, you would see we reported, back then, adjusted EBITDAC margin of 40.4%. Second, when we update that margin using current period FX rate, gets you to an FX adjusted margin of about 40.2%. And we’ve done that here. So you can see that in the 2023 column in this table. Third, deduct that the 90 basis point roll-in impact. Again, that’s all due to the roll-in math. And let’s – just to be clear, these are not businesses with margins that are going backwards. So that gets you to 39.3%, Compare that to the 39.9% we show today, and that gives you the underlying 60 basis points of margin expansion. That is really great work by the team. As we look ahead to the following 3 quarters of ‘24, it is looking like we could expand margins in the 90 to 100 basis point range in each of the next 3 quarters. Let me give you some flavor on that. First, as Pat said, Buck passed its 1-year anniversary, so that roll-in noise is behind us. Second, as discussed at our March IR Day, the carryover impact of raises given in 2023 is comparatively lesser over the next 3 quarters. And third, the reality is we are typically posting margins higher than most of our M&A targets. While that slightly impacts what we report as margin expansion, we will do these mergers all day, any day. These are great businesses with terrific talent. And when we combine, we are better together. So to repeat, expansion in 90 to 100 basis points range in each of the next 3 quarters would get you to about 60 basis points of full year margin expansion. That assumes we would post organic in that 7% to 9% range and it still is allowing us to continue to make substantial investments in data analytics, sales tools, digital service and arming our sales and service folks with the best resources in the business. Okay. Let’s move to the Risk Management segment and organic and EBITDAC tables on Pages 4 and 5, another fantastic quarter benefiting from new business wins and excellent client retention, 13.3% organic growth and margins at 20.6%. Looking forward, we are now lapping growth associated with our large new business wins from ‘23, and so we see quarterly organic for the rest of ‘24 in the 8% to 9% range. As for margins, the team has done a great job posting margins above 20% this quarter, and we believe we can hold that for the remainder of the year. That also is a bit better than our March IR Day outlook. Turning to Page 6 of the earnings release, in the corporate segment shortcut table, adjusted first quarter numbers came in better than the favorable end of our March IR Day expectations due to lower acquisition costs and some favorable tax items, primarily associated with stock-based compensation, and that’s shown in the corporate line. So, now let’s move to the CFO commentary document that we posted on our website. Not much changes at all on Page 3 or 4 other than a few tweaks to a few numbers such as FX, non-cash items, et cetera. Just do a double check with your models using these numbers. Page 5 updates our tax credit carryforwards. It shows about $820 million available at March 31, and that we would be – that we are benefiting our cash flows about $150 million to $180 million a year. Doesn’t flow through our P&L, but still a nice annual cash flow benefit to help us fund future M&A. Turning to Page 6, the top table. Recall, we introduced this modeling helper in January. It breaks down the components of investment income, premium finance revenues, book gains and equity investments in third-party brokers. Not much has changed from what we provided in March but we are still embedding 225 basis point rate cuts in the second half of ‘24. And we’ve also updated for current FX rates. The lower table on Page 6 is rollover revenues. Blue column subtotal of about $228 million is very close to the $224 million we provided at our March IR day. And remember, the pinkish columns only include estimated revenues for M&A through – that we’ve closed through yesterday. So just a reminder, you’ll need to make a pick for future M&A. Also a little housekeeping. When you read Note 3 on that page, you’ll see we had an estimate change related to some historical acquisitions that causes the gross up of revenues and expenses. It nets close to nothing, but it does flow through the P&L. We’ve adjusted these out, so there’s no impact to organic adjusted net earnings or adjusted EBITDAC or adjusted EPS. Moving to cash, capital management and M&A funding. Available cash on hand at March 31 was around $1 billion, which includes a portion of the proceeds from our February debt offering. So with $1 billion in the bank and expected strong future cash flows, we are still estimating we have total capacity in ‘24 of about $3.5 billion to fund M&A without issuing stock nor having to borrow much of any more. As for 2025, it looks like we could fund over $4 billion of M&A with free cash and debt, all of this while maintaining a solid investment-grade rating. Okay. Another terrific quarter and start to the year. Looking ahead, we see continued strong organic growth, a growing pipeline of M&A, further opportunities for productivity improvements and a culture that makes us hard to beat. I believe we are very well positioned to deliver another fantastic year here in ‘24. Back to you, Pat.
J. Patrick Gallagher: Thank you, Doug. Operator, I think we’re ready for some questions.
Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Elyse Greenspan with Wells Fargo. Please proceed with your question.
Elyse Greenspan: Hi, thanks. Good evening. My first question is on the brokerage segment. So organic, as you guys said, right, a bit better than what you expected in March. So close to the top end of the full year guided range, right, that you guys are maintaining that outlook, could you just give us a sense, do you expect growth to slow over the balance of the year? Is there some level of conservatism? I mean, Pat, you seemed positive on the pricing environment. We saw a little bit like GDP numbers today come out. I’m just trying to think about how you put that all together and how you would think growth would trend within brokerage over the next three quarters.
J. Patrick Gallagher: Well, I’m going to let Doug do the numbers. But yes, I mean, I think you’re reading me right, Elyse. I’m bullish on the environment. We are not seeing a downturn in terms of our clients. They’re employing more people. We’re seeing robust client activity at Gallagher Bassett. That’s a very good bellwether of what’s going on in the economy. Interest rates are up. The market hates inflation, but it’s good for brokers and high interest rates help us as well in terms of the growth in revenues and head count and all the rest of it. So the fundamental business environment is really, really good for us. As far as the numbers, Doug, go ahead.
Doug Howell: Yes. Listen, we don’t see much difference in each quarter going forward. We think we’ll be in that 7% to 9% range, Elyse. We do have a large first quarter and it is heavily weighted to reinsurance. So you would naturally expect us to – if we’re going to be in that range, that maybe the first quarter is a touch above the next three quarters, but I wouldn’t say it’s anything meaningful. And so we’re in that 7% to 9% range each of the next three quarters, which would bring us in, in that range for the full year. So really nothing different than what we’ve talked about the last couple of times we’ve been with you.
Elyse Greenspan: Thanks. And then the second one is on margin, right? So a little bit, like you said, the Q1 was a little bit better than the March guide, but you previously had said, right, 100 basis points in the – all three quarters. Now it’s 90 to 100 and the full year guide seems unchanged. Is it just maybe Q1 was a little bit better so now you’re taking some of that to invest internally? I know it’s a little nitpicky because it’s still 90 to 100, but just trying to kind of square the updated out-quarter margin view with what you told us in March.
Doug Howell: Well, listen, I think that the CFO commentary document has kind of said 90 to 100, I think, consistently. If I said 100% of the last IR Day, I may have said towards 100 basis points. So I think our guidance feels, to us, about the same.
Elyse Greenspan: Okay. And then one last one, the FTC, right, is looking to potentially remove non-competes from – I guess my question is two-pronged from both the ability, I guess, to bring folks into Gallagher and also considering the potential to lose talent to other players, how do you think this could impact the company if it does actually go through?
J. Patrick Gallagher: Well, let me comment on that one. First of all, I think everybody saw that the U.S. Chamber has filed a lawsuit in Texas that’s challenging this, and we’re supportive of the Chamber’s efforts. We think it’s an overreach by the executive branch. But having said that, if the new rules actually hold up, there’s a count in non-compete agreements as part of the sale of the business. And so we see that rule is having a little impact, really, on our M&A strategy. And that’s – when it first came out, that was kind of my concern. Our agreements with our production staff do not contain non-compete provisions, rather we use non-solicitation clauses. And there is a fine line difference there, but those cover clients and employees. And from our first look, we think those are going to remain enforceable. Having said all that, we want people to want to work here. The reason, this is why culture is so important. This is a great place to work, and we attract highly motivated salespeople and entrepreneurs that are passionate about doing what they do, and they want to leverage their expertise and capabilities. And we give them the data and analytics and the centers of excellence to work with. We arm them with way better armament that they get from being part of a local competitor. We’re a great place to work. So while I don’t agree with the FTC, and I do agree with the Chamber’s position, we’re supportive of that, for our business, I think it’s a non-issue.
Elyse Greenspan: Thank you.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Mike Zaremski with BMO Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.
Mike Zaremski: Thanks. Good afternoon. Just as a quick follow-up on the FTC question. One of the top 10 brokers is on record saying that their California margins are a bit lower than the rest of the rest of the regions due to a little bit higher turnover, which might be due to Cali not having non-solicited and non-competes. Just curious as have you ever sliced and diced your California margins? And are they a little bit lower than the rest of the company?
J. Patrick Gallagher: Sliced and diced every margin by every possible measure you can think of. And no, they’re not a bit lower. We’ve been trading in California for 50 years. We love the state, we’re big, big there, and our people love working there.
Mike Zaremski: Okay. That’s clear. Switching gears to M&A. You guys – and I’ve asked this in the past, but I’ll just keep asking, because these are big numbers. So Doug, you said $4 billion of capacity for next year. That’s clear. But these are just big numbers, $3.5 billion this year, $4 billion next year. Does this imply, if you look at, like, the top 100 list of brokers, I know that’s just U.S., there’s lots of overseas stuff. But just – should we be thinking that you guys do some chunkier size deals as time progresses to be able to kind of fully deploy cash and debt?
J. Patrick Gallagher: Mike, this is Pat. I think it’s fair to say that when opportunity presents itself, we’re not afraid. I mean, 10 years ago, we stepped up and bought Wesfarmers out of Australia for $1 billion. That was the biggest play we’d ever made, and had, in fact, some financing for it that’s worked out incredibly well. I think our purchase of Willis was somewhere on the order of – Willis Re was somewhere on the order of $4 billion. And last year, we spent a good bit as well. So we’re not afraid to look at chunkier deals, but you hit on it. There’s 100 top 100. There happens to be 29,900 in the United States alone that are smaller than that. That’s where our activity is based most of the time.
Doug Howell: Yes. I think – Mike, this is Doug. I think that we have a chassis now that we can bring on a lot of smaller acquisitions, nice family-owned businesses that realize that they can be better together with us. I think that our M&A integration process is pretty smooth, very refined, 700 deals over the last 20 years. So we’ve got that down. And I think more and more, smaller or local brokers are realizing they can get the resources from us overnight that they’ve been wanting to have for maybe 20 years. So I think we have an advantage right now that family-owned broker now sees that they get to join us. This is their forever home. They don’t have to sell into a different model that maybe will flip them or sell them to a different owner or break them apart in order to get value. They see that what’s being talked about of capabilities is real inside of us. And sometimes when they go to another quarter for them, they’re saying what they’re going to do versus what they have done. So I think that we have the opportunity to increase the volume of that nice tuck-in deals that we see out there. And I think that our story is getting stronger and stronger every day. Higher interest rate, it does not help others reinvest into their business. We reinvest so much into our business day in and day out. There are new ideas for tools and capabilities and the others just can’t say that. They haven’t done it. I don’t think they’re going to do it in a higher interest rate. So I think the volume of our tuck-in deals will increase. Will we spend $3.5 billion this year and $4 billion next year. Yes, maybe we’ll see. I think we’ve got a good shot at it.
Mike Zaremski: Okay, thanks. I will get back in the queue.
J. Patrick Gallagher: Thanks Mike.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of David Motemaden with Evercore ISI. Please proceed with your question.
David Motemaden: Hi, thanks. Good morning or sorry, good afternoon. Long day.
J. Patrick Gallagher: I don’t know maybe, I thought you are in Asia, that’s okay.
David Motemaden: Yes, I actually don’t even know where I am. But Pat, I wanted to just talk about your comments you made on the property insurance side and on clients looking to add incremental coverage or limits and just how I can think about that as a potential offset to some of the moderation in property insurance pricing that you were talking about as well. Just help me think about the – both of those factors and sort of how to think about that moderation and the impact that could have on your organic growth in the future.
J. Patrick Gallagher: Well, first of all, I think that when you look at that, those were in the section of the prepared remarks that had to do with reinsurance. There’s been a lot of demand the last number of years for cat covers and what have you that frankly were hard to meet. And that’s why we talk about the fact that it was more orderly this 1/1. We were able to complete what people wanted more or less. But there has been an appetite for more cover there that buyers and sellers have walked away from. But I think as we start to see pricing stabilize, become more predictable, that allows it to flow into their rating structure, etcetera. There’s demand for more cover on their part, and we’re meeting that demand. And I think that is offsetting some of the potential. Now remember, we didn’t see property rates come down this quarter. What we’re saying is that the increase moderated. So I think that there’s kind of – on the retail side, if you’re a retail buyer – and remember, most of our book of business is the commercial middle market. Don’t get me wrong, we do a lot of risk management business, but these tuck-in acquisitions and the like that we’re doing are clearly middle market players. Those people don’t have a lot of choice. They’re buying full cover at higher prices. And if that moderates a bit, it’s good for the client.
Doug Howell: Interestingly, David, we have – we’re seeing rate increases and the exposure unit increases in the middle and smaller market greater than we did in the larger account size whereas, say, you go back a year or so ago, it might have been just the opposite. So we’re starting to see – if you’re talking about some rate moderation and the increase, it’s starting to pick up a little bit in the middle and small market space. The second thing is, remember, if the rate moderates, our customers are very good about opting out of coverage or as much coverage as rates go up and then opting back in for coverage to buy more when rates are coming down. So we’ve never captured the full increase of the rate and we won’t suffer the entire give back if rates moderate a little bit. So there’s that opt in, opt out. We haven’t really talked about that much in the last 5 years or so. But we’re seeing customers opt back in to buy more coverage if there are some moderation in the increase of the rates.
J. Patrick Gallagher: Also on the property side, back to that, David, you’ve got – many years were zero interest rates, not the last couple, but zero interest rates left the schedules pretty much untouched. So you do have underwriters now being much more disciplined around the values, and that’s pushing values up. So we’ve got the benefit of more values being insured in the property business. And my prepared remarks basically pointed out that property was up nearly 10% this quarter. So we’re not seeing rates dropping. We’re seeing rates go up in property a little less viciously. Now having said that, if the wind blows this fall, we’re 1 month away from the start of the hurricane season, I’m just telling you all bets are off. I don’t know what’s going to happen. So for our clients sake, I hope that we have a benign season.
David Motemaden: No, thanks for that. And yes, I do – I was referring also, and you guys answered it, just the primary market, the moderation there. It is interesting to hear more about sort of that opt-in which I have not thought about. So that is helpful to hear about that. Thanks for that. And then if I could just add one more, just one more question. So it sounds like there were some large life sales that came through towards the end of March. Was that a pull forward from future quarters? Or I guess, sort of outlook on the pipeline of the life sales and just how that – how you’re thinking about that throughout the rest of the year.
Doug Howell: As probably more of the – if you remember, in December, we had some push out of the fourth quarter. So I would say it might be more catch-up than it is pulling from the future. And we’re talking about $5 million on a $3 billion revenue quarter. So it was – it’s not meaningful in any of our numbers. The difference. We love the business, but it’s not – it doesn’t make a big difference in any of our numbers.
David Motemaden: Got it. So that was in your sort of outlook range that you gave in March. So the upside this quarter was not just solely from the life sale?
Doug Howell: That’s right.
David Motemaden: Okay, thank you.
J. Patrick Gallagher: Thanks, David.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Mark Hughes with Truist Securities. Please proceed with your question.
Mark Hughes: Yes. Maybe good afternoon.
J. Patrick Gallagher: Hi, Mark.
Mark Hughes: Hello. Pat, did you give the breakout for open brokerage versus the MGA or binding business within the wholesale?
J. Patrick Gallagher: I did not.
Doug Howell: You got about 16% open brokerage this quarter.
Mark Hughes: And then with the binding, I think it’s been running mid-single digits. Is that…
J. Patrick Gallagher: Higher than that. So more like 10%, 11%.
Mark Hughes: Okay. And then anything on the workers’ comp side? Or just waiting for signs of life there in terms of frequencies, severity, pricing? Is it more of the same? Or do we have some reason to think it could be in selecting?
J. Patrick Gallagher: No, I think that’s really interesting, Mark. In my career, that line has been, at times, pretty darn cyclical, and it is just as flat as a pancake. It’s just going along. You might see two here, three there. And it’s really just kind of flat.
Mark Hughes: Yes. Yes, thank you very much.
J. Patrick Gallagher: Thanks, Mark.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Katie Sakys with Autonomous Research. Please proceed with your question.
Katie Sakys: Hey, thanks. Good afternoon. First, just kind of wanted to touch on the margin expansion guidance for the full year. If organic revenue growth were to come in higher than the current guide, whether that comes from the wind blowing and property rates reaccelerating or for something else, how much of that would you guys kind of envision letting fall to the bottom line? Like, should we expect to see greater margin expansion? Or are there other areas of investment opportunities that you guys would kind of like to see some progress made on.
Doug Howell: Well, listen, I don’t think that our investment opportunities would be rolled out fast enough in order to spend more going into if we had to pop up in organic growth and starting in August, if something – the wind blows or something like that. So I don’t think we would have the ability even to ramp up on some of the – some big investment opportunities to offset that additional organic growth. But I’m trying to do some mental math here. If we’re up another 0.25 point in organic, it might produce another, in a quarter, to $10 million or $15 million if we had it for half a year, something like that, if I’m doing my math right. So I don’t think – it would probably naturally improve the margins a little bit. I want to make sure we go back and clarify the question within wholesale, right? When you combine binding and programs, 11%, the programs are really more running around 2% to 3%. And open brokerage is in that 16% range. So just to make sure that we – I answered one question, Pat has answered a combined question and just to break those three out, 16%, over 10% and low single digits on the program side.
Katie Sakys: Thanks. It’s a helpful clarification. Just maybe as a quick follow-up, in terms of benefits from headcount controls and client-related expense saves, are those things that you expect to persist as the year goes on, or are those more specific to 1Q in particular?
J. Patrick Gallagher: Listen, I think the team does a really nice job of looking at our headcount controls. We have work model that show how many people we need to have, how many do we have. Do we need to hire in July, August and September, we can kind of forecast that. Our retention has been very good. I got to say that when you look at it, our retention is better today than it was, let’s say, in ‘18 and ‘19. So, I think we have done a really nice job of taking care of our employees throughout this inflation period. So, we are not seeing significant terminations here. So, overall, I think our work planning models and our ability to kind of forecast retention has helped us not have to push and pull on the joystick there to see how many more we need to bring on, how many do we need to take off. So, it’s pretty steady right now.
Katie Sakys: Alright. Thank you.
Doug Howell: Thank you.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Yaron Kinar with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.
Yaron Kinar: Thanks. Good afternoon. I have no idea where I am but I am pretty sure it’s afternoon. So, I just want to touch on a couple of market questions, if I could. I think in the prepared remarks, you were talking about general liability and retail being up like 9%. If I go back to the investor meeting from, like a month or so ago, I think you were talking about maybe seeing liability lines moving up to the 9%, 10% range over the course of a year or two. So, are you – are we talking apples-to-apples here, or are you surprised by the magnitude of improvement that you are seeing in liability lines right now?
J. Patrick Gallagher: I think – let me go back to my prepared remarks. We have seen umbrella in the quarter, up 9%, which is kind of in-line with what we are talking about in March. GL 7%, and that’s where I think probably we have got to look at our carriers and say, are there going to be some reserve challenges going forward. So, 7% seems pretty – it seems pretty stable. Maybe there will be a push up a bit. And package, which is of course, property and liability together at 8%, where comp, really not much, 2%. I think that feels like it’s going to be there for the year. I think you could take our March discussions and kind of update them six weeks later for those numbers.
Yaron Kinar: Okay.
J. Patrick Gallagher: There is a tone of concerns that seems to be louder today in our interactions with carriers and clients around casualty rate adequacy. So, I would say that what we were chatting about in January and February seems to be louder today. That confirms to be a little bit louder today. And so I think that – and we are just – I don’t know if I have enough data yet to say absolutely that there was a tone shift in March in our data compared to what we were seeing in January and February, but when you look at some isolated situations, you boil that down with what we all read, when you combine that with what we hear in meetings with the carriers, we feel that casualty rates probably are more likely to be going up again in the next three quarters – each of the next three quarters than we would see going down by any means. So, there is a tone shift there. I just can’t quite see it 100% in our data yet, but it seems like it’s coming.
Yaron Kinar: That makes sense. I appreciate the color. And then – and I apologize if you have already addressed this, and I may have missed it, but we saw the stamping office data come out in March around E&S flows and into our rates. And it seems like it was a little bit of a surprise and disappointment. How much of that do you think is noise? Are you seeing that slowdown in your wholesale business, or is that real? And sorry, or is that just noise and you are kind of looking past that and still see a very strong E&S market?
Doug Howell: That is noise. Our E&S business is on fire. We are seeing submissions come in. We are renewing our business. I don’t have any caution on that.
Yaron Kinar: Thank you.
Doug Howell: Thanks.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Meyer Shields with KBW. Please proceed with your question.
Meyer Shields: Thanks. I was hoping to start on the reinsurance side. I think you talked about 13% organic growth. And is there any way of breaking that down between maybe the increasing limits that are being purchased versus market share wins versus pricing?
J. Patrick Gallagher: I don’t have the actual stats on that, Doug...
Doug Howell: Well, listen. I will tell you this that we had a terrific new business quarter. Our teams are working together. I think we are starting to see some nice wins of working with our retailers on that. So, when you go down, we were hearing a lot of great stories about teams settled in. When we look back and see it and try to measure our success on doing that merger, our teams are working together. We are selling more new business. Our retention seems to be pretty darn good on that. And I think the fact is customers are buying some more cover while you are seeing a little price stability maybe. So, we are checking the box on everything that we have considered to be this to be a successful merger.
Meyer Shields: Okay. That’s helpful. And second question, and clearly, I guess the premise is we are not seeing any successful pressure on the part of carriers to reduce commission percentages. I was hoping you would update us on efforts that are being made, even if they are not successful.
J. Patrick Gallagher: No. I think that our partners are being very reasonable. We are not having a lot of head-butting on that subject at all.
Meyer Shields: Okay, perfect. Thank you.
J. Patrick Gallagher: Thank you, Meyer.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Rob Cox with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question.
Rob Cox: Hey, thanks. So, I think in March, at the Investor Day, you guys were pretty optimistic on the potential for reacceleration in RPC in the remainder of 2024 due to higher exposure to property business and less workers’ comp and the potential for casualty pricing increases. Is that still the case, or is the property rate environment, with a little deceleration in the rate of increase, made you change your view a little bit?
J. Patrick Gallagher: No, I think our view is unchanged. We are very bullish.
Rob Cox: Okay. Got it. And then maybe sort of a similar question in some ways, but if we strip out reinsurance, is the touch lower organic guide for the remainder of the year the same, or do you think ex-reinsurance, what would you say, for the trend of organic growth ex-reinsurance?
Doug Howell: Well, yes, I think just because reinsurance is a little more skewed seasonally to the first quarter, it did help us, let’s say, get from 8% to 8.9% this quarter, right. We do have some pretty good April 1 renewals coming in, so we will see that in the second quarter. So, I think we will get the benefit of reinsurance a little bit in the second quarter, even though it’s not as big percentage-wise as the total amount of our revenues. And then in the third quarter and fourth quarter, we will see what happens. We will see what happens with the wind. Hopefully, there is not a shake anywhere else in the world. But right now, that’s why I say, I feel pretty comfortable each quarter in that 7% to 9% range because reinsurance did help, but it wasn’t like it moved us from 6% to 9%. It moved us up 75 basis points, something like that this quarter.
Rob Cox: Got it. And if I could sneak one more in, in the Brokerage segment, could you remind us how much you are reinvesting in the business annually and what you are spending it on?
Doug Howell: Well, it’s a laundry list. I mean first, you start with our people. I think that our training, our development, our internship program, I think bringing on more producers, we are seeing lots of interest in joining Gallagher by experienced producers out there. I think they see that the organization has a lot to offer for them. Then the next thing you would look at is technology. We are spending a ton on technology that both enables us to sell more, right, enables us to service better. Those numbers are probably – the projects on the sheet could be $75 million, something like that. When I look at this year’s budget, some of that’s capital, some of that’s operating expense. Looking back, we are spending about $75 million a year on cyber today. If you go back 5 years ago, we were spending about $15 million on that, so the fact that we are investing in infrastructure improvement, cyber and other infrastructure improvements. Then you get down into the data and analytics. We are hiring more and more people every day that help us slice and dice our data, look at industry statistics and bring a better delivery of that data through a digital platform to our customers. My guess is we are spending $30 million a year on those efforts. And then you look at AI now, there is starting to be a lot of AI projects inside of the company that are starting to deliver some yield. And so we are spending $5 million a year kind of on AI-related activities out there. So, you add all that up, it can get to $200 million to $300 million pretty quickly, what we think we are doing to make a better franchise going forward.
J. Patrick Gallagher: I would like to emphasize what Doug – I have got a lot of listeners on this call. I would like to emphasize where Doug started this. Most of that spend is, in one way or another, directly related either to making our service offering to our clients better, and we happen to know, for instance, that our digital offerings from small accounts through the risk management accounts, connectivity, things like Gallagher Go or even a middle market client can see what their policies are, what’s going on with their buildings, etcetera, etcetera, are being incredibly well received. And we are rolling things out like that literally every quarter, so that’s spend. And then you get into the data and analytics. And if you had asked me 5 years ago, clients would really care that much about being able to tell them what people like you buy. Oh my God, they care. And then they want to know the rate structure and they want to know why. And when I was started – when I was selling insurance day-to-day, I tell them they had a good deal because Hartford quoted and so did CNA. Buy the cheaper one, let’s move on, or I would have a reason why they should stay where they were, but I don’t have capability of saying, here is what’s happening in the world market. It’s incredible. And remember what we said in our prepared remarks, 90% of the time our people go out and they are fighting against somebody who is substantially smaller and doesn’t have any of this, let alone $200 million to $300 million to reinvest in more of it. I mean it’s just – it’s an incredible advantage. I appreciate the question.
Rob Cox: Awesome color. Thank you.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Mike Ward with Citi. Please proceed with your question,
Mike Ward: Thank you, guys. Kind of a similar question, but specifically on reinsurance, just curious where you guys are in terms of the innings of getting that business where you want it to be?
J. Patrick Gallagher: It’s really where we had dreamed it would be. The team is incredibly solid. We are not having defections. We have got – what’s been fun about that is that there is a remarkable interest in having continued relationships and building relationships with the retail side of the house, which is what we predicted. We predicted it, we did it that we would be, not only getting data and analytics, but we would be working together, and we have seen that impact on existing, for instance, pooled accounts that were the biggest and probably the longest running pooling broker in the country, especially in the public sector business, been incredibly helpful, the dialogue back-and-forth. That’s just one example. But – and the business now I think they would really feel like they are part of the enterprise. They are not the new kids anymore. There is always a period when you come to school and you are the new kid. You are the new kid, right. Well, that’s not it anymore. I mean you see them in the hall, they recognize the retailers, they recognize me, Doug, whatever. And the opportunities to invest in data and analytics there and the thirst for that from their clients, tremendous opportunities, and it’s working out incredibly well.
Mike Ward: Thanks. And then maybe just one last one on group benefits, kind of curious if you can sort of discuss how the renewals have gone and how top line is trending from your perspective. And I guess the – what’s the tone like among the customer base in terms of health of the economy and then hiring and labor?
J. Patrick Gallagher: Well, interestingly, like, the tone from our clients is there is a large amount of concern. And we are sitting with clients that, a, in some instances, don’t know why they have turnover. And we are able to get in and do some data analytics around what’s going on with them and where – what’s going on there. So, a very deep concern about wanting to hold on to their top people. We also have an awful lot of people just trying to attract people to fill jobs. Pick stuff off of racks, serve tables, whatever, and that’s difficult. So, they are trying to differentiate themselves in that regard.
Doug Howell: And there is a lot of concern on their part around cost. Medical inflation is real. Those costs get passed directly back to the employer. Then you have got the whole problem of inflation. Inflation is difficult. So, I think what it’s doing is it’s making our professionals far more valuable than the local person that comes out and says there is four of us in the office and we are really good at this, and let me show you a PPO and maybe I can get another quote for your insurance. That’s just not cutting it anymore. And that’s not, I am not talking about 5,000 live cases here. The people that are employing 100, 150, 200 people, they need this kind of help. So, it’s a very robust period for us, and it is a difficult time for employers. Where are they going to get the right people to fill the jobs and then how do they hold on to them.
Mike Ward: Thank you so much.
J. Patrick Gallagher: Thanks Mike.
Operator: Thank you. And our last question is coming from Mike Zaremski with BMO Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.
Mike Zaremski: Hi, great. Just a quick follow-up, you guys always give color on umbrella, lots of people do. Just curious, is there any way you can dimension what percentage of your business is umbrella?
Doug Howell: I can dig it out. Did you have a second piece of that?
J. Patrick Gallagher: Do you have another question, Mike? We will dig on that for a second.
Mike Zaremski: No, I – that was actually my only question.
J. Patrick Gallagher: And we are looking here.
Doug Howell: So, let’s see, in ‘23, I would say, it makes up 6% of our business.
Mike Zaremski: Okay. Thanks so much. Have a good evening.
Doug Howell: Thanks Mike.
J. Patrick Gallagher: Well, I think that’s it for questions, if I can just make a comment here. Thank you again for joining us this afternoon. And I would like to thank our 53,000 colleagues around the world for their efforts. Their hard work and dedication is evident when we report another fantastic quarter of growth and profitability. As I look ahead, I remain very bullish on our prospects and believe we are well positioned to deliver another excellent year of financial performance. We look forward to speaking with the investment community at our IR Day. Thank you again for being with us this evening. Have a nice evening.
Operator: This does conclude today’s conference call. You may disconnect your lines at this time.
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.