🔥 Premium AI-powered Stock Picks from InvestingPro Now up to 50% OffCLAIM SALE

Democrat-led states support Biden in fight over moderating social media content

Published 07/31/2023, 12:59 PM
Updated 07/31/2023, 02:00 PM
© Reuters. A worker uses his phone in the shade, in New York City, U.S., July 5, 2023.  REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
GOOGL
-
META
-
GOOG
-

By Brendan Pierson

(Reuters) -A group of Democratic state attorneys general has urged a federal appeals court to lift an order sharply curbing the ability of government officials to push social media companies to moderate content they deem harmful.

The top law enforcement officers of 20 states and the District of Columbia, led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, said in a filing on Friday with the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the order hampers efforts by government officials to stop the spread of false information.

The July 4 preliminary order from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty in Louisiana came in a lawsuit filed in May 2022 by Republican attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri.

They alleged that U.S. government officials, under both Democratic President Joe Biden and his Republican predecessor Donald Trump, effectively coerced social media companies to censor posts over concerns they would fuel vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic or upend elections.

The judge said federal officials violated the right to free speech under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment when they began asking social media companies such as Meta's Facebook (NASDAQ:META) and Google (NASDAQ:GOOGL)'s YouTube around 2019 to limit the spread of posts they considered to be misinformation.

The order is temporarily on hold while the Biden administration appeals it.

If the 5th Circuit allows the order to take effect again, it will bar government agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, from talking to social media companies for "the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech" under the First Amendment, with narrow exceptions.

The Democratic attorneys general in Friday's filing called the ruling "erroneous."

"In purporting to protect First Amendment values, the district court significantly restricted the flow of public discourse on vitally important issues," they said in the filing.

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey responded in a statement on Monday: "Protecting the First Amendment should be a bipartisan issue," he said. "The fact that it isn't is deeply concerning."

© Reuters. A worker uses his phone in the shade, in New York City, U.S., July 5, 2023.  REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo

The office of Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The appeal is expected to be heard on Aug. 10 by 5th Circuit Judges Edith Brown Clement, Jennifer Walker Elrod and Don Willett, all appointed by Republican presidents.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.