🚀 Netflix soars after Q4 earnings. Catch the best Big Tech plays before they report.Use free screener

California utility faces billions in claims for fire damage even if it did nothing wrong

Published 01/15/2025, 12:22 PM
Updated 01/15/2025, 03:18 PM
© Reuters. Charred remains of buildings are pictured following the Palisades Fire in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood in Los Angeles, California, U.S.  January 15, 2025. REUTERS/Mike Blake

© Reuters. Charred remains of buildings are pictured following the Palisades Fire in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood in Los Angeles, California, U.S. January 15, 2025. REUTERS/Mike Blake

EIX
2.78%
ETN
-0.19%

By Tom Hals

(Reuters) - Victims of the Los Angeles wildfires, likely the costliest in U.S. history, are seizing upon a unique California legal doctrine that allows them to collect from their power utility if its equipment caused the blaze -- even if the company did nothing wrong.

Numerous lawsuits were filed this week by victims of the Eaton (NYSE:ETN) fire, which broke out east of the city, against Southern California Edison, a unit of Edison International (NYSE:EIX). The lawsuits allege that the company's high-voltage transmission towers were the source of the devastating blaze, which was driven by dangerous high winds and lower humidity.

Edison has said that it did not detect any operating anomalies on its transmission wires in the 12 hours before the fire or up to an hour after its ignition.

"Typically when you have a fire caused by electrical infrastructure you do see a signature voltage drop or current increasing and we have not seen that in our study," Edison CEO Pedro Pizarro told Bloomberg TV. He said the company followed protocols for wildfire mitigation approved by regulators.

Authorities have said that the cause of the various fires are under investigation.

If those power lines were a substantial cause of the fire, that could be enough to recover billions of dollars in damages from the utility, even if it complied with regulations, legal experts said.

That's because in California, a legal doctrine known as "inverse condemnation," which has traditionally been used by property owners to seek compensation from the government for taking private land, has been extended by state courts to utility companies.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads.

The courts have held that utilities that damage private property while providing public services such as electricity are liable, even if the there is no finding of negligence.

"California is very unusual in that normally this doctrine only applies to government entities," said Daniel Farber, a professor at the University of California Berkeley School of Law, where he specializes in energy and the environment.

"The plaintiffs won't have to prove (the utility) poorly maintained these transmission wires or did a shoddy job," Farber said.

Most of the destruction has been the result of two blazes -- the Palisades Fire and the Eaton Fire -- which have destroyed more than 6,000 structures and killed at least 24 people.

The cost of the disaster is expected to run into the tens of billions of dollars.

California lawmakers have created a wildfire insurance fund with access to $21 billion that is meant to ensure that Southern California Edison remains solvent and victims' claims are paid in full. Pizarro told Bloomberg TV that the fund will cap the company's exposure at $3.9 billion.

Most of the lawsuits have been brought in state court in Los Angeles by victims of the Eaton Fire, who cited eyewitness accounts of flames near the transmission towers for the source of the blaze and its alleged link to Southern California Edison, a defendant with significant assets. Reuters has not confirmed the eyewitness accounts.

The lawsuits alleged that Edison was negligent for failing to properly maintain its transmission and distribution lines but also brought a claim for inverse condemnation.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads.

The lawsuits seek damages for lost wages, costs to rebuild and other losses that cannot be currently calculated, which will likely vastly outstrip insurance coverage. The cases will likely take years to resolve.

“The price tag of these wildfires will be something we’ve never seen before,” said plaintiffs lawyer Mikal Watts, who has previously represented wildfire victims.

Edison will review the complaints when it receives them, a company spokesman said . The company said it remains committed to supporting the communities affected and restoring power.

If the company's equipment is found to be the substantial cause of the Eaton Fire, Edison would be liable for economic losses. If plaintiffs can prove negligence then they can get damages for personal injuries and wrongful death as well, according to Gerald Singleton, who filed one of the first lawsuits.

"There are times where a utility will say that their equipment started it, but they weren't negligent. That's very rare," Singleton said.

EIX: A Bull or Bear Market Play?

Don't miss out on the next big opportunity! Stay ahead of the curve with ProPicks AI – 6 model portfolios fueled by AI stock picks with a stellar performance this year... In 2024 alone, ProPicks AI identified 2 stocks that surged over 150%, 4 additional stocks that leaped over 30%, and 3 more that climbed over 25%. That's an impressive track record. With portfolios tailored for Dow stocks, S&P stocks, Tech Stocks, and Mid Cap stocks, you can explore various wealth-building strategies. So if EIX is on your watchlist, it could be very wise to know whether or not it made the ProPicks AI lists.

Unlock ProPicks AI now

Latest comments

Loading next article…
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.