💎 Fed’s first rate cut since 2020 set to trigger market. Find undervalued gems with Fair ValueSee Undervalued Stocks

Businessman sues RBS for $184 million over alleged conspiracy

Published 06/11/2016, 08:10 AM
Updated 06/11/2016, 08:20 AM
© Reuters. A logo of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) is reflected in the window of a branch office in London
NWG
-
CBS_old
-

By Lawrence White and Andrew MacAskill

LONDON (Reuters) - The former CEO of a software company is suing RBS (L:RBS) for allegedly conspiring to push the business into administration to benefit from its sale, court filings show, in the latest case to allege misconduct by the bank's restructuring division.

Scottish businessman Neil Mitchell is seeking 128 million pounds ($184 million) in damages on claims that Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) conspired in 2007 with co-defendants KPMG and U.S.-based fund Cerberus Capital Management (CBS.UL) to sell assets of his company, Torex Retail plc, for below their value.

Mitchell alleges RBS pushed Torex Retail into administration - a form of protection from creditors under which external managers from KPMG were brought in - in order to force its sale to Cerberus and so rid its books of a bad loan it was owed by Torex, documents filed at Britain's High Court of Justice show.

Mitchell also alleges in the court filing that RBS and Cerberus conspired secretly to ensure Torex would be sold for below its value to Cerberus.

The allegations include conspiracy by unlawful means, breach of trust and negligence.

"We have thoroughly investigated Mr Mitchell's allegations and believe them to be entirely without merit. Mr Mitchell has chosen to issue legal proceedings which will be met by a full defense," a spokeswoman for RBS said.A spokeswoman for KPMG denied it acted improperly, said Mitchell's claims had no substance and that KPMG had applied to have the case struck out.

Cerberus declined to comment.

The claims once again focus attention on RBS's Global Restructuring Group (GRG), a division being investigated by Britain's financial regulator following claims by hundreds of small businesses which say GRG mistreated them or forced them out of business.

RBS, 73 percent-owned by the UK government, asked law firm Clifford Chance to undertake an independent review of GRG, which found no evidence for the allegations.

Britain's Financial Conduct Authority has hired firms Promontory Financial Group and Mazars to conduct its own investigation and produce a report, originally scheduled for the end of last year and now expected to be published in mid-2016.

The regulatory inquiry comes as RBS Chief Executive Ross McEwan is trying to rebrand the bank as the biggest supporter of smaller businesses in the UK.

The court documents name former RBS Chairman Philip Hampton and former Chief Executive Stephen Hester as among those who represented RBS in its dealings with Torex Retail.

© Reuters. A logo of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) is reflected in the window of a branch office in London

Hester and Hampton declined to comment.Torex Retail, which sold software for touch screen shopping tills, went into administration in June 2007 after Mitchell and other executives at the firm blew the whistle on fraud they had discovered within the company.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.