💎 Fed’s first rate cut since 2020 set to trigger market. Find undervalued gems with Fair ValueSee Undervalued Stocks

Big oil companies defeat US consumer lawsuit over production, prices

Published 09/16/2024, 12:52 PM
Updated 09/16/2024, 03:30 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The logo of Exxon Mobil Corporation is shown on a monitor above the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in New York, December 30, 2015.  REUTERS/Lucas Jackson/File Photo
CVX
-
XOM
-
OXY
-
DVN
-
PSX
-
ET
-

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) -Several oil companies including Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) and Chevron (NYSE:CVX) defeated an appeal on Monday by consumers who accused them of colluding with former U.S. President Donald Trump, Russia and Saudi Arabia to cut oil production, boosting prices at the pump.

In a 3-0 decision, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said two dozen consumers could not pursue class action claims because they concerned political questions and the oil-producing policies of foreign countries.

The court also found a lack of proof that the oil companies violated antitrust law by conspiring to raise prices.

Other defendants included Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN), Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) LP, Occidental Petroleum (NYSE:OXY), Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX), Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR), Hilcorp Energy and the American Petroleum Institute.

Lawyers for the consumers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The defendants' lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests.

The lawsuit stemmed from a price war that broke out in March 2020 between Russia and Saudi Arabia.

Both countries boosted production quickly, ending three years of production and sales limits, after Russia rejected cuts proposed by Saudi Arabia and other OPEC producers.

Consumers said the oil companies' complaints about sinking prices prompted the Trump administration to cajole oil-producing countries to slash production, boosting industry profitability.

Within about two years, the price of a barrel of oil soared above $100 from less than $20, while the U.S. retail price of a gallon of gas more than doubled to over $5.

In Monday's decision, Circuit Judge Ryan Nelson said courts shouldn't second-guess White House foreign policy, and had no authority to order Russia and Saudi Arabia how to manage their oil resources.

He also said the early 2020 start of the COVID-19 pandemic drastically reduced oil demand, and was an "obvious alternative explanation" for why oil companies cut production.

Monday's decision upheld a January 2023 ruling by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White in Oakland, California.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The logo of Exxon Mobil Corporation is shown on a monitor above the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in New York, December 30, 2015.  REUTERS/Lucas Jackson/File Photo

Nelson was appointed to the bench by Trump, a Republican. The other judges on Monday's panel, Ronald Gould and Richard Tallman, were appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton.

The case is D'Augusta et al v American Petroleum Institute et al, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-15878.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.