Selloff or Market Correction? Either Way, Here's What to Do NextSee Overvalued Stocks

Big banks defeat U.S. Treasury rigging appeal

Published 02/01/2024, 10:58 AM
Updated 02/01/2024, 11:05 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Bank of America logo is pictured in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., January 30, 2019. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/File Photo
C
-
BAC
-
GS
-
JPM
-
MS
-
BCS
-
BNPQY
-

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Thursday dismissed an appeal by investors who accused 10 of the world's largest banks of antitrust violations for conspiring to suppress competition in the now $26 trillion market for U.S. Treasury securities.

In a 3-0 decision, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan said the 18 plaintiffs, including pension and retirement funds, did not plausibly allege that the banks violated the Sherman antitrust law by conspiring to rig Treasury auctions, or to boycott newer platforms for trading Treasuries.

The banks include Bank of America, Barclays, BNP Paribas (OTC:BNPQY), Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM), Morgan Stanley, NatWest and UBS. Credit Suisse was also a defendant before UBS bought it last June.

Investors alleged that banks colluded from 2007 to 2015 to use chat rooms to swap confidential customer orders, and then exploiting their "collective pool of knowledge" to buy Treasuries at higher yields and lower prices.

Bank of America, Barclays, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley were also accused of colluding to boycott electronic platforms that offered better prices and direct trading between buyside investors, known as "all-to-all," to benefit their own platform.

In a 72-page decision, Circuit Judge Dennis Jacobs said information shared on chatrooms was largely "inconsequential market chatter," and the plaintiffs' statistical analyses didn't focus specifically on what the banks supposedly did wrong.

Jacobs called the boycott allegations even weaker. He said the plaintiffs' use of "scattered" data points over two decades, and claim that the banks threatened rival trading platforms, did not create an "actionable conspiratorial narrative."

Lawyers for the investors did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Thursday's decision upheld a March 2022 ruling by U.S. District Judge Paul Gardephe in Manhattan.

The case began in July 2015, following news reports that the U.S. Department of Justice was probing Treasury manipulation.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Bank of America logo is pictured in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., January 30, 2019. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/File Photo

Banks have separately paid billions of dollars in criminal and civil penalties to settle probes into the rigging of foreign currencies and the now-defunct interest rate benchmark Libor.

The case is In re: Treasury Securities Auction Antitrust Litigation, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 22-943.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.