✂ Fed’s first rate cut since 2020: Use our free Stock Screener to find new opportunities fastExplore for FREE

White House monitoring US port talks, considering supply chain impacts

Published 09/24/2024, 04:13 PM
Updated 09/24/2024, 08:41 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Shipping containers are stacked for storage at Wando Welch Terminal operated by the South Carolina Ports Authority in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, U.S. May 10, 2018. Picture taken May 10, 2018. REUTERS/Randall Hill/File Photo

By Lisa Baertlein and David Shepardson

LOS ANGELES/WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Officials from President Joe Biden's administration are monitoring labor talks but not trying to broker a labor deal to avert an Oct. 1 strike at U.S. East and Gulf Coast ports that handle roughly half of the country's ocean imports, administration officials said on Tuesday.

Negotiations between the International Longshoremen's Association union and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) employer group appear to be deadlocked over pay as the Sept. 30 contract expiration approaches.

A threatened strike by 45,000 ILA-represented workers at three dozen affected ports, including New York and New Jersey, Houston and Savannah, Georgia, would send delays and costs cascading through U.S. supply chains at a time when rising costs for necessities like food, housing and healthcare have become a pivotal issue in the Nov. 5 presidential election.

"We are monitoring and assessing potential ways to address impacts to U.S. supply chains related to operations at our ports, if necessary," White House spokesperson Robyn Patterson said. "We continue to encourage the parties to continue negotiating towards an agreement that benefits all sides and prevents any disruption," she said.

The USMX, which includes container carrier and terminal owner Maersk, on Monday said the Department of Labor, the Federal Mediation & Conciliation Service and other federal agencies had reached out to the employer group.

Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su and the Department of Labor for more than a month has been in touch with the negotiating parties because establishing lines of communication is standard operating procedure, an administration official said.

Any involvement in negotiations would be at the invitation of both the union and employers.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Shipping containers are stacked for storage at Wando Welch Terminal operated by the South Carolina Ports Authority in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, U.S. May 10, 2018. Picture taken May 10, 2018. REUTERS/Randall Hill/File Photo

The Biden administration has said the president does not intend to invoke a federal law known as the Taft-Hartley Act to prevent a strike at ports on the East Coast and Gulf of Mexico.

Acting on the invitation of both sides involved in last year's West Coast port negotiations, Biden dispatched Su to help hammer out a deal, which resulted in a 32% pay increase over the life of the new contract.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.